ISSUES OF DEVELOPMENT OF MANAGEMENT CULTURE IN LEADERS

Аннотация

The article covers the issues of achieving the effective functioning of democratic management in state power under the conditions of today's reforms, the development of management culture in management personnel, the essence of such concepts as personnel, individual potential, and the formation of personnel reserves today. Key words: reforms, state power, democratic management, management culture, personnel training, managerial personnel reserve, personnel, personnel reserve, personal potential, management, leader. In the context of today's reforms, the formation of the national state power on the basis of democratic values recognized in the world is defined as the first priority in the chain of tasks. It is of practical importance to develop the management culture in order to achieve the effective functioning of democratic management in the state power. Because in a system that does not follow it, negative relations such as mutual distrust, failure to take responsibility, negligence, and carelessness arise, which causes the management of state power to fall into disarray. That is why, in the training and placement of personnel in the system of state power, attention is being paid to their ability to manage, as well as to what extent they realize their morale and responsibility for the performance of the tasks assigned to them. It is necessary to scientifically analyze the socio-psychological aspect and importance of the concepts of "personnel", "personnel pool", "personal potential (competence)", "personnel - resource", "organizational structure (system)" in the formation of the management personnel reserve. In particular, in social psychology, the concept of "personnel" is widely used as a synonym for the concepts of management, management, leader. Also, the concept of "frame" is used in the study of the "frame" problem in cognitive psychology, along with sociology, communication, cybernetics, linguistics, and other social and humanitarian sciences. Also, in the social sphere, "cadre" (French sadre) represents the concept of personal content. Personnel is applied to qualified employees in enterprises, institutions, firms, joint-stock companies, banks, trade unions and public organizations. Personnel is a person who has specific 5 INNOVATIVE RESEARCH IN SCIENCE International scientific-online conference expertise, knowledge, and experience in a specific field, and who works in a specific team [1]. So, as a person - a subject - an individual, he actively performs direct activities and actions in various spheres of society. Its activity is inextricably linked with creation, organization, procedures, and changes. Personnel is a "force" that directly affects the development of the external environment and society through interpersonal relations, and it forms the basis of all sectors of the national economy. In social psychology, "reserve of personnel" is understood as a group of leaders and specialists who perform management activities, meet the requirements of a certain level of career (position), and have undergone targeted training. Formation of personnel reserve is considered to have a legal, organizational and psychological basis. Also, in social psychology, "potential" - (lat. potential) means power, opportunity. At the same time, the concept of "personal potential" is also widely used. Personal potential is the ability of a person to increase his internal capabilities. The problem of potential was studied as an object of research by A. Adler, Z. Freud, E. Fromm, K. Jung, S. L. Rubinstein. According to S. L. Rubinstein [2], a person creates, organizes, and shapes himself as a subject who changes his existence, determines his interaction with the external world and his activities. A subject is a person who acts consciously. Personnel resource B.G.Ananev believes that from the beginning of personal development, scientific knowledge about reserves and resources is necessary for the realization of social expectations [3]. Also, in the study of personnel problems within the scope of social psychology, the concepts of manager, management, and leader are used in almost the same sense and in many cases side by side. In particular, the difference between a leader and a leader is the existence of his legal dimension, that is, he performs activities in an official organization, on a legal basis, and enters into his functional duties. The leader is formally a representative of power. And the leader is a charismatic person who unites the interests and goals of subjects united in certain groups, distinguished by his behavior and activities. The activity of the leader is manifested in the stable maintenance and development of spiritual, socio-psychological standards of mutual communication and relations. Since the emergence of human relations, especially statehood, the desire to understand management and its specific features has deepened. As a result, a number of important theoretical considerations and practical conc