Соблюдение конфиденциальности при разработке и использовании программного обеспечения для онлайн-приема в высшее образование

Аннотация

Калит сўзлар: Высшие учебные заведения по всему миру набирают Программное обеспечение студентов, позволяя им подавать заявки через онлайн- для онлайн-доступа, систему. Цель состоит в том, чтобы облегчить процесс конфиденциальность, поступления, потому что многие студенты приезжают из защита данных, права, Генеральный регламент о других городов, и даже из-за рубежа. Большинство высших учебных заведений считают, что студенты, выросшие с 1 MA Student, Department of Media and Technology Studies, University of Alberta, Canada Email: aigul.kantoro@gmail.com 2 Lecturer (Highly Qualified Specialist), Department of Business Law, Tashkent State University of Law, Uzbekistan Email: doctorammaryounas@gmail.com Жамият ва инновациялар – Общество и инновации – Society and innovations Special Issue – 09 (2022) / ISSN 2181-1415 защите персональных использованием цифровых технологий («цифровые данных (GDPR) аборигены»), мало заботятся о конфиденциальности своих данных. В этом документе утверждается, что «неприкосновенность частной жизни» и «Право» являются устоявшимися нормами во всех основных юрисдикциях и являются ключом к обеспечению человеческого достоинства, безопасности и самоопределения. Таким образом, персональные данные студентов, собираемые с помощью систем онлайн-приема, и их защита требуют целостного подхода к проектированию системы и ее использованию, который включает в себя сочетание правовых, административных и технических гарантий. Acknowledgement of the “Privacy” and the “Right” The Oxford English Dictionary (2022) entry for “privacy” defines the term as “state or condition of being alone, undisturbed, or free from public attention, interference or intrusion”. The Dictionary dates the creation of word “privacy” in English in circa 1500s (Oxford English Dictionary, 2022). The etymological roots of the term come from Latin word ‘privatus’ with its meaning “apart from the State, peculiar to oneself, of or belonging to an individual, private” (Engelhardt, 2000). Within the years scope of terminology have captured numerous aspects including social, political, legal, psychological, philosophical and religious. The initial acknowledged claim for a “right to privacy” in 1890 lies in an article on The Right to Privacy published by Samuel Warren and Louis Brandeis (1890). The article demands legal recognition of “the right to privacy, as a part of more general right to the immunity of the person - the right to one’s personality” (Warren & Brandeis, 1890). The work provided encouragement for development of consequences during privacy invasion cases. Two lawyers outlined the necessity of re-defining common principle of law of having full protection in person and property. The work of Warren and Brandeis is a response to underlying changes brought by press and photography, also known as “yellow journalism” (p. 193). The major concern of authors was over impreciseness and ethical issues of the press and its influence on “sacred precincts of private and domestic life” (p. 195). Two authors point to the work of E. L. Godkin (1890) “The Rights of the Citizen: To his Reputation” that demands amendments and reconsiderations to allow “each member in a greater or less degree enjoy the confidence and good opinion of his fellows”. The article proposed law as one tool to address privacy issues in the United States. In 1881, the Supreme Court of Michigan recognized a certain level of privacy in a case where a woman giving birth had an unauthorized man enter the room with her doctor (Danielson, 1999). After publication of the article, Supreme Court of Georgia held that unauthorized use of a person’s photo for an advertisement constituted it as a breach of privacy (Pavesich, 1905). The law intended to embrace privacy rights in the twentieth century with the 1939 Restatement of Torts including privacy torts, and in 1977 the American Law Institute included four classic privacy cases in its Restatement (Second) of Torts (Park & Kaye, 2020). The Warren and Brandeis article bears historical importance as the forerunner of privacy rights recognition. In late 1880s, Judge Thomas Cooley (1888) proclaimed that people had a right “to be let alone”. Following these developments in 1965 the privacy was enunciated as a 63 Жамият ва инновациялар – Общество и инновации – Society and innovations Special Issue – 09 (2022) / ISSN 2181-1415 constitutional right in the United States. In Griswold v. Connecticut, Justice William O. Douglas placed a right to privacy in a “penumbra” (shadow) cast by the First, Third, Fourth, Fifth and Ninth Amendments (Clark, 1974). The decision of the Court covered only one dimension of privacy. But Griswold “allowed Americans to imagine more robust applications of the ‘right to be let alone’” (Igo, 2018). In 1948, the United Nations General Assembly adopted the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) that guarantees individual rights of everyone (United Nations, 2022). The United Nations (2022) statement accepted as t