COOPERATION OF STATE AND PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS IN THE FIGHT OF CORRUPTION

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION determining the risk of corruption. The fact is that According to the results of a sociological survey the threat of corruption is not considered a crime, among the youth of Central Asia, there are three and the state has not established responsibility for main problems in Kazakhstan: corruption 47.3%, allowing it. However, the risk of corruption is unemployment 24.2%, and poverty 8.0%. For always perceived negatively by the society, Kyrgyzstan: corruption 37.5%, unemployment including civil society institutions, and the society, 35.3%, poverty 8.5%. According to the youth of in turn, reacts to it accordingly. The reason is that Tadjikistan: corruption is 42.0%, unemployment is the first corruption complications are first felt in 17.9%, and poverty is 12.0%. Answers of society. respondents from Uzbekistan: unemployment 44.0%, corruption 17.8%, employment 5.9% . The Researchers also put forward their approaches in results of the sociological survey show that the this regard. In particular, according to A. Tursunov, problem of corruption is high in the region and “Analysis shows that the general public plays an requires systematic work to eliminate it. important role in exposing corruption. In this regard, it is possible to cite many examples of cases If we look at the experience of countries that have of corruption that were not detected by state achieved effective results in the fight against agencies and were exposed by the general public. corruption and curbed corruption, we can see that At that time, there were bodies with special powers civil society institutions are one of the main to determine the facts of corruption. This is participants in the fight against corruption and the because the public and the media cannot be government in these countries. In general, the deceived and misled. No matter how hidden it is, effectiveness of the fight against corruption cannot corrupt people try to hide such facts. Society and be achieved without the participation of civil mass media will also learn about the facts of society institutions. corruption” . The role of civil society institutions in the fight In addition, it should be noted that one of the against corruption is manifested, first of all, in https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajpslc 52 THE USA JOURNALS THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE LAW AND CRIMINOLOGY (ISSN- 2693-0803) VOLUME 06 ISSUE06 important means of limiting or preventing participation of civil society institutions in the fight corruption is transparency and accountability. The against corruption; reason is that corruption always happens secretly. thirdly, it is necessary to increase the role of the It takes root well in a space where transparency mass media in the fight against corruption, to does not exist. Transparency cannot be ensured by constantly support their activities. In this regard, the government itself without influencing the independent special mass media, at least programs society. The issue of responsibility is the object and covering issues of the fight against corruption, are subject of such corruption, and a member of important; society. Society's sense of this responsibility prevents the individual from corruption. fourthly, it is necessary to develop cooperation between state and civil society institutions in the Another aspect of the role of civil society fight against corruption” . institutions in forming an intolerant attitude towards any form of corruption is that corruption At the same time, society always realizes or strives is not accepted by society as a normal social norm. for the need to fight against corruption. In this If the society fights for this alone and the regard, the government's initiative and intolerance government or civil servant turns a blind eye to to corruption are more important. Only after corruption or encourages it, then slowly the society feels this in practice, it starts to show its members of the society accept it as a normal intolerance against corruption. situation or rather as a social norm. Now society is The authorities show their intolerance to starting to get used to it instead of fighting against corruption with the following efforts. First of all, it. From this point of view, the firm attitude of the the authorities need to coordinate the forces in the public to any form of corruption is extremely fight against corruption, that is, the capabilities of important in the fight against corruption. society and the authorities, and to monitor In a word, civil society institutions should cooperation. These are important components of a represent a comprehensive mechanism of comprehensive national anti-corruption strategy. formation, development, and implementation of Coordination will have to go both ways. The first is society’s opportunities and potential in the fight policy coordination in this regard, and the second against corruption. is coordination of activities for its implementation. At the same