К содержанию
РецензированоEN2020

THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN NECESSARY DEFENSE AND EXTREME NECESSITY

commons attributes Republic Of Uzbekistan (An Independent Researcher At The Higher School Of Judges Under The Supreme Council Of Judges Of The)

The American Journal of Political Science Law and Criminology · 04 · 2020

Аннотация

This article analyzes the difference between necessary defense and extreme necessity. In addition, the article analyzes the social danger and wrongfulness of an act committed by an arrested person for causing harm during the detention of a person who has committed a crime, the harm caused to him is associated with specific circumstances and does not deviate from the limits of actions necessary for detention. KEYWORDS Socially dangerous act, committed, person, during detention, harm, necessary defense, crime, punishment, responsibility.

Доказательный фрагмент

«This article analyzes the difference between necessary defense and extreme necessity.»

Образец извлечения

Демо-превью

This article analyzes the difference between necessary defense and extreme necessity. Полный текст публикации CiteX не хранит — доступ к первоисточнику открывается по DOI согласно лицензии издателя и выбранному плану.

Цитирований
0
Тип
Журнал
Страна
Узбекистан
Ключевые слова
Socially dangerous act, committed, person, during detention, harm, necessary defense, crime, punishment
Открыть DOI
Спросить CiteX об этой работе

Смежные источники

[4]ЮриспруденцияRUРецензированоОткрытый доступ