The necessity of systematization of normative documents on the prevention of crime

Аннотация

the article substantiates the need to systematize normative documents on the prevention of offenses, based on the results of the analysis of scientific views of legal scientists, the practice of prevention of offenses and normative documents. Scientific conclusions and proposals for improving national legislation aimed at developing scientific and theoretical approaches to these issues have been developed. Scientific conclusions were made about 85 Scientific research results in pandemic conditions (COVID-19) the importance of systematization (codification) of normative legal acts on the prevention of offenses. Keywords: crime prevention (warning), early prevention of offences, prevention of offences, special prevention of offences, individual diagnostics, systematization, codification. The development trend observed in the legislative system in recent years, in the legal sphere as a whole, requires the restructuring of previously known social relations in the light of modern realities. At the same time, it is necessary to regulate social relations by social norms, which were ignored by the legislature, as well as relations that arose as a result of the formation of globalization processes. This indicates the need to streamline existing and adopted legislation in order to improve the effectiveness of legislation. This streamlining of legislation is carried out by direct systematization. And thanks to this, you can create a system that ensures the integrity of regulatory documents and improves the quality of legislation. Systematization of legislation does not mean the technical development of a unified system of laws, such an approach, according to A.S. Pigolkin, leads to an error because “the system of legal documents is not a simple mechanical conglomerate (set) of legal documents, but consists of interconnected and interdependent parts and represents a single regulatory mechanism” [3]. Systematization as a universal tool helps to determine the necessary legal provisions, which, in turn, helps to identify and eliminate inconsistencies, contradictions and deficiencies in the legal framework between the rules of law [1; 2]. According to D.I.Safarov, “in any legal system, when legislation reaches a certain point of development, and the number of laws and other regulatory legal acts increases significantly, they must be systematized” [5]. Indeed, crime prevention legislation has also reached a similar stage of development. The time has come to summarize and streamline regulatory documents in this area. Of course, opportunities for systematization in improving existing legislation, as well as all existing areas of law, can be used to further simplify crime prevention legislation and strengthen its practical aspects. It should be noted that the systematization of crime prevention legislation requires an inextricable link between legislation in this area and their norms. In law-making practice, systematization of legislation is usually carried out through forms of unification, incorporation, consolidation and codification. 86 Scientific research results in pandemic conditions (COVID-19) In this regard, N.K. Skripnikov notes that in the legislative process, “incorporation” and “consolidation”, which are often considered relatively convenient and simple forms of systematization, are rejected [6]. A striking example of this is the adoption of the Law on the Approval of the Electoral Code of the Republic of Uzbekistan on June 25, 2019, which combined 26 provisions of the law governing electoral relations into a single system and turned them into a single code. In addition, in addition to systematization, the concept of “classification of legislation” is widely used in our national legislation, however, “classification of legislation”, according to D.I.Safarov, appears as a form of systematization, and sometimes it can be equated with incorporation. To date, state authorities have adopted about 10 laws and more than 10 by- laws governing relations in the field of crime prevention, the adoption of which coincides with various periods of reform in the field of crime prevention. Some of the norms in some of them are outdated, and some are mutually incompatible, most of the rules are repeated, and in some there are gaps in the legislation. This adversely affects the effectiveness of activities, causes problems and deficiencies in the application and application of the provisions of this law. As a result, there is a need to systematize crime prevention legislation. Several forms of systematization have been cited in the scientific References: [4]. In particular, D.Kh.Safarov identifies accounting, incorporation, consolidation and codification as four forms of systematization of legislation [5]. Under the form of accounting refers to activities related to the accounting of regulatory legal acts adopted by state bodies with certain powers or committed in the company with amendments and additions [5]. Incorporation is a metho