SCIENTIFIC AND THEORETICAL ISSUES OF STUDYING THE HISTORY OF UZBEK KHAN ABDULLA KHAN II

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION the Safavid state of Iran during the period of Shah There are still many individuals in the history of Tahmosb (1524-1576) and Shah Abbas (1587- Uzbekistan who have not been sufficiently studied, 1627), and the Ottoman state during the period of not introduced to the public, and who have not Sultan Suleiman (1520-1566), and being larger received their due assessment. One of them is than some of them in terms of territory, The Abdullah Khan ibn Iskandar Khan, a great Khanate of Bukhara was raised to a higher level by statesman, a skilled commander, and a creative the efforts of Abdullah Khan. ruler. If Muhammad Shaybani Khan (1500-1510) was the founder of the Uzbek state, his nephew Sources and historiography of the subject Ubaydullah Khan (1533-1540) was the protector Shaybani Abdullah Khan ibn Iskandar Khan's and strengthener of this state, Abdullah Khan personality and information about his activities (1557-1598) was the creator of the centralized are covered in the following sources created in state, who ended the political disunity. Also, in Movarounnahr, Khorasan and Iran: Hafiz Tanish international politics, one of the four major states al-Bukhari's "Abdullanoma" ("Sharafnomai that emerged in the East was the Khanate of Shahi"), Muhammadyar ibn Arab Muhammad Bukhara during the time of Abdullah Khan. The Qatagan's "Musaxhir al-bilad", Muhammad Talib's Khanate of Bukhara had the power to compete "Matlab ut-talibin", "Tarihi tomm" by Sharofiddin with the Babur state during the period of Rakimi, "Tazkirat us-shuaro" by Mutribi Jalaluddin Muhammad Akbarshah (1556-1605), Samarkandi, "Tarihi Muqimkhani" by Muhammad https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajssei 92 THE USA JOURNALS THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCE AND EDUCATION INNOVATIONS (ISSN- 2689-100X) VOLUME 06 ISSUE10 Yusuf Munshi, "Shajarai Turk" by Abulghozi It is known that during the last one and a half Bahadirkhan, as well as Hasanbek Rumlu's "Ahsan centuries, the era of the Uzbek khanates in the XVI- at-Tavorikh", Iskandarbek Munshi’s "History of XIX centuries was backward, and their statesmen Alamaroi Abbasi" are among them [1]. were viewed unilaterally as the cause of this backwardness. In the general context of historical During the years of independence, the Shaybani research, relatively backward periods, historical period became one of the less studied periods. figures with a negative image are hardly studied by Even so, it would be a mistake to say that there is generations as important history. Shaybani Khan complete indifference or underestimation towards and his descendants who ruled the Turan region Shaybani Khan and Abdullah Khan in Uzbek have been poorly researched for many years history. While the general picture remains according to the above criteria. Shaybani Khan, unchanged, there are plenty of researchers who Ubaydullah Khan and Abdullah Khan, who were advance new perspectives. Although there were no the biggest representatives of the dynasty, at first special works devoted to the personality of glance, are seen as the accomplishers of great Abdulla Khan during the Soviet period and the things, who caused great historical changes, but in years of independence, as well as abroad, certain Uzbek history, they were openly condemned or at studies have been conducted within the least indifferent to their activities. First, during the framework of one or another research. In Soviet era, the rulers of the Shaybani period were particular, during the Soviet period, V.V. Bartold, left behind the curtain. There were a number of P.P. Ivanov, A.A. Semyonov, M.A. Salakhetdinova, reasons for this, of course. First of all, the main goal E.A. Davidovich; in the years of independence R.G. of the Soviets to criticize the Khanate period and Mukminova, B. Ahmedov, H.H. Toraev, G.A. their rulers was to idealize the existing, current Agzamova, A. Ziya, G. Sultonova, A. Jumanazar; system, in the words of Abdulla Kadiri, to instill in foreign scientists such as Mustafa Budak, Remzi the public what was brought to light from "the Kilich, Gulay Karadag Chinar, Abdukadir Majid, dirtiest, darkest days of our history, the former Hamza Kamal [2] paid attention to some aspects of Khanate period." Therefore, this approach was also Abdullah Khan's work in their scientific research. reflected in historical stories and novels (for In recent times, supporters of Abdullah Khan's example, the works of Cholpon, Abdulla Kadiri, personality re-evaluation have also been Mirkarim Asim, Pirimkul Kadirov, etc.). Secondly, increasing. For example, since 2006, the author of approaches to Uzbek historiography during the this paper has been conducting scientific research Soviet era did not significantly differ from those in on the history of the Shaybani period, and now he literature: the era of the Shaybanids is is preparing a special scientific work on the topic characterized by political instability, invasion of "Bukhara Khanate during Abdullah Khan's