ARBITRARINESS IN CAPITAL SENTENCING SYSTEM: THE PERSISTENT FURMAN-LIKE CHALLENGE

Аннотация

"Arbitrariness in Capital Sentencing System: The Persistent Furman-Like Challenge" is a comprehensive study that examines the issue of arbitrariness in the capital sentencing system. The research delves into the persistent challenges reminiscent of the landmark case Furman v. Georgia, which addressed the arbitrary application of the death penalty. Through an analysis of legal cases, statistical data, and policy frameworks, this study explores the factors contributing to the arbitrariness in capital sentencing and assesses the efforts made to address this long-standing issue. The research highlights the importance of ensuring fairness and consistency in the administration of the death penalty and identifies potential avenues for reform to uphold constitutional principles and human rights. KEYWORDS Arbitrariness, capital sentencing, death penalty, Furman v. Georgia, constitutional principles, human rights, fairness, consistency, legal cases, statistical data, policy frameworks, criminal justice, reform, judicial system, due process, equal protection.