Scientific and Theoretical Problems in The Concept and Types of Systematization of Legislation

Аннотация

This article examines the significance of systematizing legal norms, the appropriate terminology for this process, and the main types of legislation systematization. It provides an analysis of scholars’ views on each issue, explores the experiences of other countries, and compares them with existing norms and practices reflected in the normative-legal acts of our country. Based on this analysis, the article attempts to offer comprehensive solutions and proposals to the identified scientific and theoretical problems. The discussion includes the positions of various groups of scholars and the underlying reasons for their perspectives, along with the author’s own viewpoint on the matter. Keywords: Systematization of legislation, codification, incorporation, consolidation, consolidated document. position. In addition, the article explores the practices Introduction: In the system of legal sciences, the of different legal families regarding the understanding systematization of legislation is one of the key issues of of consolidation and provides conclusions based on both theoretical and practical importance. Today, there that analysis. is an increasing need to enhance the efficiency of public administration, deepen legal reforms, and make METHODOLOGY legislative acts more comprehensible and accessible for The aim of this research is to identify and propose citizens and legal entities. From this perspective, the solutions to the existing issues in forming a general systematization of legislation serves as a crucial concept of the systematization of legal norms, as well mechanism that ensures the coherence and logical as in understanding the types of legislation consistency of legal regulation instruments. systematization. The primary objective is to analyze Systematization not only helps control the growing these problems and review various proposed solutions, number of normative legal acts but also organizes and to offer additional alternative legal and them, eliminates duplicative norms, updates outdated organizational recommendations. To achieve these provisions, and resolves contradictions. Naturally, this goals, the author employed several scientific research process necessitates a thorough scientific-legal analysis methods, including comparative analysis and logical of the concept of legislation systematization. reasoning. Therefore, in this study, two key issues are addressed: