Antroponyms And Their Research Issues

Аннотация

This article discusses the significance of onomastics within linguistics, specifically its sub-field of anthroponymy, and its connections with other disciplines. It also explores the research object of anthroponymy, its interdisciplinary study with fields such as history, literature, ethnography, and sociology, and its unique characteristics. Keywords: Anthroponym, history, linguistics, ethnography, common linguistic elements, geographical names, tribe names, Karakalpak female names. actions in past historical events, and determine Introduction: Anthroponym is a main branch of people’s status in society [2]. Consequently, by onomastics within linguistics, comprising the collection studying people’s names, it’s possible to identify the of proper names. Anthroponymy, as a part of unique characteristics of Karakalpak people’s names onomastics, is the branch of linguistics that studies from different historical periods. proper personal names. People’s names are primarily given to distinguish a person’s status in society. Anthroponymy is a widely researched field within Regarding this, V.A. Nikonov states: “People’s names general linguistics. In the study of onomastics within are extremely important in and for society. They cannot Turkic linguistics, scholars like V.V. Radlov, G.A. Levshin, be neglected in society. Thus, the strong interest in P. Melioranskiy, V.V. Bartold, N.A. Baskakov, N.A. people’s names is understandable”. [1:33] Like other Aristov, G.N. Potanin, and A.M. Sherbak have made words, anthroponyms are subject to the rules of significant contributions. Meanwhile, Kazakh language; thus, they form an essential part of the onomastics, particularly the field of anthroponymy, has language system and are studied in conjunction with been specifically researched by scholars such as T. ethnography, history, sociology, and jurisprudence. Januzaqov, G. Jarkeshova, V.U. Maxpirov, O. Sultaniyayev, E. Qoyshibayev, V.N. Potapova, A. In fact, by studying personal names, we can uncover Abdirahmanov, G. Qonqashpayev, S. Amanjolov, M. the language history, customs, social status, and other Tinishbayev, and D. Junisov. Among their notable mysteries of a people. The current composition of works, J. Agabekova examined the ethnolinguistic Karakalpak personal names includes elements common characteristics of Arabic-origin names that have to Arabic-Persian, Turkic, and Mongolian languages, as become established in the Kazakh language, while A. well as names that have entered through the Russian Baygutova investigated the linguo-folkloristic and language. Moreover, Karakalpak people’s names gender aspects of anthroponyms in her research [3]. require comprehensive study from the perspective of their grammatical structure and semantic features. As In Uzbek linguistics, scholars like G.F. Sattarov, T. society changes and develops, so do science and Januzaqov, R. Qongurov, J. Muxtorov, E. Begmatov, D. culture, and with them, personal names are Abdurahmonov, E. Qilichev, and A. Xudaynazarov have continuously enriched with new names appropriate to researched anthroponyms. E. Begmatov defended his each society. Some of these names become obsolete candidate’s dissertation on “Uzbek Language and fall out of use. Personal names help unlock the Anthroponymy” in 1965. I. Xudoynazarov defended his secrets of historical pages, reveal who performed candidate’s dissertation on “The Significance of American Journal Of Philological Sciences 11 https://theusajournals.com/index.php/ajps American Journal Of Philological Sciences (ISSN – 2771-2273) Anthroponyms in the Lexical Stock of the Language and Ashim, and the ethnonym Qonirat, providing historical Their Semantic Features” in 1998. In 2000, N. Husanov descriptions with several credible pieces of evidence defended his doctoral dissertation on “Lexico-Semantic [8]. Q. Qoshanov, in his work “Issues of Interrelation Features of Anthroponyms in the Language of 15th- between Russian and Karakalpak Languages” (Nukus, Century Written Monuments”. 1991), demonstrated the circumstances of Russian personal names entering the Karakalpak language and In Karakalpak linguistics, which has assimilated the their usage peculiarities. In addition, the author paid linguistic experiences of other peoples, attention has special attention to the issues of writing Karakalpak also begun to focus on the study of this field. Scholar personal names. N.A. Baskakov was among the first to emphasize the crucial importance of studying Karakalpak toponymy The first dictionary of Karakalpak personal names, and onomastics. In the first volume of his work titled “Personal Names”, was published by O. “Karakalpak Language”, he provided a list of Karakalpak Bekbawlov in 1973. The second dictionary, “Karakalpak people’s names. These were the initial scholarly Names” was published in 1994 by O. Dospanov, M. observations and collected materials on Karakalpak Qalenderov, E. Dospanova, and G. Qalenderov. These anthroponymy. In his a