The Use of Individual Methods for Preserving and Developing Children's Speech Characteristics in American-Slavic Families

Аннотация

This article is dedicated to examining CITATION Abramau Usevalad. (2025). individualized methods for preserving and developing children’s speech characteristics in American–Slavic COPYRIGHT © 2025 Original content from this work may be used under the terms families. The growing prevalence of mixed-language of the creative commons attributes 4.0 License. households and the risk of heritage-language attrition underscore the relevance of targeted interventions. Drawing on nine recent studies, the paper analyzes four key domains: heritage-language assessment tools, shared-syntax priming, home-based socialization strategies, and school-based immersion models. Novelty lies in synthesizing clinical linguistics, psycholinguistic priming, ethnographic family practices, and policy analysis into a unified framework. Within the work, it describes Sentence‐Repetition‐Task scoring schemas, investigates structural priming data, and explores case studies of “One Parent, One Language” and lullaby‐based sessions. Particular attention is paid to how error‐type allowances and high‐frequency constructions can reinforce Slavic speech development. The study sets out to identify best practices for dual‐ language vitality and to propose a hybrid model adaptable to Ukrainian and American schools. Methods include comparative analysis, source synthesis, and case‐study evaluation. In conclusion, it outlines an integrated model for assessment, curriculum, family engagement, and programme design. This article will benefit speech-language pathologists, bilingual educators, and policymakers. Keywords: heritage language, bilingual assessment, structural priming, OPOL, immersion programme, cross- linguistic influence, Slavic speech, scoring schema, family language policy, speech pathology. Introduction: The capacity to navigate two or more The American Journal of Social Science and Education Innovations 08 https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajssei The American Journal of Social Science and Education Innovations languages fluently is both a cognitive asset and a cultural science. L.M. Cycyk et al. [2] offered cultural and necessity for children raised in American–Slavic families. linguistic adaptations of early interventions. O. As these families negotiate heritage‐language Shevchuk‐Kliuzheva [7] described daily bilingual preservation alongside English acquisition, children practices in Ukrainian communities. S. Lally and frequently exhibit uneven proficiency: deep lexical and colleagues [3] proposed a novel scoring schema for morphosyntactic roots in Slavic tongues may erode Polish-English SRep tasks. M. Węsierska et al. [8] under schooling pressures, while English fluency investigated crosslinguistic structural priming. U. advances rapidly. Maintaining Slavic speech Markowska-Manista, D. Zakrzewska-Olędzka, and K. characteristics—such as case‐marking endings, Sawicki [4] studied home-based strategies in Polish– aspectual verb pairs, and Slavic‐specific prosody— African families. N. Zaytseva [9] analyzed U.S. bilingual supports not only linguistic diversity but also the education program archetypes for policy lessons. emotional bonds and cultural identity transmitted Methods applied include comparative analysis of across generations. Yet, best practices for individualized scoring metrics and priming effect sizes, synthesis of support remain dispersed across disparate disciplines, ethnographic case data, structural‐semantic curriculum from speech‐language pathology to bilingual education analysis, and policy review. policy. This article synthesizes nine pivotal studies to address