К содержанию
РецензированоRU2026

COMMONALITIES AND VARIATIONS IN THE SEMANTIC AND STRUCTURAL USE OF FLORA IN ENGLISH AND UZBEK DESCRIPTIONS

Ibrohimova Nasiba Mirzohid qizi

Исследователь · 2026

Аннотация

В статье рассматриваются семантические и структурные особенности употребления терминов, связанных с флорой, в английском и узбекском языках. Анализируются сходства и различия в передаче человеческих качеств, эмоций и ценностей через образы растений. Проведен сравнительный анализ метафорического и грамматического использования во флоре. Ключевые слова: флора, метафора, семантика, структурный анализ, английский язык, узбекский язык In both Uzbek and English, flora-related terms serve not only to describe the natural world but also to enrich language through metaphor, symbolism, and syntactic structures. Although both languages use flora to express similar ideas, such as beauty, strength, or growth, the specific meanings and structures in which these terms are employed can differ significantly, shaped by each language’s cultural, historical, and environmental context. This section delves into the commonalities and variations in how flora is used semantically and structurally to describe both the physical and https://scientific-jl.com 1 5 1 62-son_6-to’plam_May-2025 ISSN:3030- 3 6 1 3 T A D Q I Q O T L A R jahon ilmiy – metodik jurnali metaphorical realms in English and Uzbek, offering insight into the broader cultural values of each language. Flora-related terms in both English and Uzbek often carry meanings that transcend their literal definitions, functioning as powerful symbols for human characteristics, emotions, and social values. However, the specific plants that are symbolically important in each culture vary based on geography, historical associations, and cultural values. Both English and Uzbek languages use certain types of plants to symbolize universal human values like love, beauty, strength, and purity. For example, flowers are frequently employed to symbolize beauty and love in both languages. In English, the rose is perhaps the most iconic symbol of romantic love, while in Uzbek, the tulip holds a similarly strong association with love and beauty. This shared usage reflects a common human tendency to associate flowers, which are often perceived as delicate and aesthetically pleasing, with positive human emotions. Trees, too, hold significant symbolic weight in both languages, frequently used to convey ideas of strength, endurance, and longevity. The oak tree in English and the plane tree in Uzbek are commonly referenced as symbols of stability and resilience. These associations may stem from the physical attributes of these trees—large, long- lived, and able to withstand various environmental challenges—making them apt metaphors for enduring human qualities. Despite these commonalities, the specific plants that are elevated to symbolic status in each language often differ. The rose, as mentioned earlier, dominates English floral symbolism, particularly in literature, poetry, and popular culture, where it is often associated with love, passion, and sometimes secrecy 1. In Uzbek, however, the tulip (lola) holds more cultural significance, often appearing in poetry, folk tales, and art as a symbol of love, renewal, and aesthetic beauty. Additionally, certain plants hold specific cultural meanings that do not have direct counterparts in the other language. For example, in English, the daisy is often associated with innocence and purity, especially in relation to children, while in Uzbek, the mulberry tree (tut) has strong associations with life and productivity due to its historical importance in silk production. These culturally specific symbols highlight the close relationship between flora and the social, economic, and environmental history of a given region. The syntactic and structural roles that flora-related terms play in English and Uzbek also reveal notable differences and similarities. While both languages use flora- related terms in descriptive, metaphorical, and figurative expressions, their structural deployment can vary due to differences in grammatical rules and sentence construction. 1 Czarniawska, B. (2005). Metaphor in Organizational Research. Edward Elgar Publishing.p74 https://scientific-jl.com 1 5 2 62-son_6-to’plam_May-2025 ISSN:3030- 3 6 1 3 T A D Q I Q O T L A R jahon ilmiy – metodik jurnali In both languages, flora-related terms are frequently used as modifiers in descriptive phrases, adding layers of meaning to a person, object, or situation. For example, in English, one might say “a blossoming relationship” to describe a relationship that is growing or developing in a positive direction. Similarly, in Uzbek, one could describe a “gullab yashnagan hayot” (a flourishing life) to indicate a life that is full of prosperity and joy. In these instances, plants are used metaphorically to convey positive growth and vitality, a common theme in both languages. Both languages also make use of flora in idiomatic expressions. In English, phrases like “to turn over a new leaf” or “to be rooted in tradition” use plant-related metaphors to express concepts of personal change and cultural

Доказательный фрагмент

«В статье рассматриваются семантические и структурные особенности употребления терминов, связанных с флорой, в английском и узбекском языках.»

Образец извлечения

Демо-превью

В статье рассматриваются семантические и структурные особенности употребления терминов, связанных с флорой, в английском и узбекском языках. Полный текст публикации CiteX не хранит — доступ к первоисточнику открывается по DOI согласно лицензии издателя и выбранному плану.

DOI не указан
Цитирований
0
Просмотров
0
Тип
Журнал
Страна
Узбекистан
Ключевые слова
flora, metaphor, semantics, structural analysis, English language, Uzbek language, Keywords: flora
Спросить CiteX об этой работе

Смежные источники