К содержанию
РецензированоUZ1978

TITLE: DISCOURSE BETWEEN TEACHERS AND STUDENTS: A PEDAGOGICAL AND SOCIOCULTURAL EXPLORATION

Scientific supervisor: Shamsutdinova Nazokat · Author: Mirzaazizova Farangiz

Исследователь · 1978

Аннотация

This article provides an in-depth analysis of the nature, function, and impact of discourse between teachers and students in educational settings. It explores how classroom communication influences students’ cognitive development, emotional well-being, and academic performance. The paper discusses different types of classroom discourse, such as monologic, dialogic, and interactive discourse, and the role each plays in shaping the learning environment. Special emphasis is placed on sociocultural influences, the power dynamics embedded in teacher-student interactions, and strategies for promoting effective, inclusive, and engaging dialogue. Drawing from contemporary research in linguistics, pedagogy, and psychology, the article underscores the critical role of discourse in fostering a democratic and learner- centered classroom culture. Introduction: Communication is at the heart of education. Every interaction between a teacher and student is an opportunity not only for knowledge transfer but also for shaping attitudes, building trust, and supporting personal development. Teacher-student discourse encompasses verbal and non-verbal communication, feedback, questioning, silence, and even classroom routines. The quality of this discourse can significantly influence a student’s engagement, motivation, and achievement. Therefore, understanding how discourse works in the classroom is essential for improving teaching practices and learning outcomes. 1. Theoretical Foundations of Classroom Discourse The study of classroom discourse is grounded in several theoretical traditions: • Sociocultural Theory (Vygotsky, 1978): Emphasizes that learning occurs through social interaction. Teachers scaffold student learning through language, guiding them within their “Zone of Proximal Development” (ZPD). • Constructivist Theories: Suggest that students actively construct knowledge through meaningful dialogue. • Interactionist Approaches: View language as both a means and an end in education. Through interaction, students develop not only language skills but also cognitive structures.Language in the classroom is not neutral—it reflects social roles, expectations, and power dynamics. Thus, the discourse between teachers and students must be critically examined to understand its impact on equity and learning. 2. Types of Classroom Discourse https://scientific-jl.com 1 4 8 62-son_3-to’plam_May-2025 ISSN:3030- 3 6 1 3 T A D Q I Q O T L A R jahon ilmiy – metodik jurnali Different types of discourse exist within classroom interactions. These include: 2.1 Monologic Discourse: This is teacher-centered talk, where the teacher dominates the conversation. While efficient for delivering information, it limits student participation and critical thinking. 2.2 Dialogic Discourse: Involves open-ended questions and reciprocal exchange of ideas. It encourages learners to express themselves, ask questions, and explore alternative viewpoints. Teachers act as facilitators rather than mere transmitters of knowledge. 2.3 Interactive Discourse: Characterized by collaborative interaction, where students also take responsibility for shaping the discussion. This form promotes peer learning, active engagement, and deeper understanding. Example: In a science class, instead of simply explaining the water cycle, a teacher might ask, “What do you think happens to rainwater after it hits the ground?” This invites students to hypothesize, discuss, and co-construct knowledge. 3. Functions of Discourse in Teaching and Learning Discourse serves multiple pedagogical functions: • Cognitive: Facilitates the development of higher-order thinking skills such as analysis, synthesis, and evaluation. • Social: Builds a sense of community and mutual respect in the classroom. • Affective: Encourages emotional expression, supports motivation, and helps reduce student anxiety. • Metacognitive: Helps students reflect on their thinking and learning processes through dialogue. 4. Strategies for Enhancing Teacher-Student Discourse Teachers can apply several strategies to make classroom discourse more effective: 4.1 Use of Open-Ended Questions: Rather than yes/no questions, open-ended prompts stimulate deeper thought. For example:• “What makes you think that?” • “Can you explain your reasoning?” 4.2 Wait Time Providing students with a few seconds to think before answering leads to more thoughtful and elaborate responses. 4.3 Revoicing and Reformulating: Teachers can repeat or paraphrase what a student has said to validate their contribution and clarify for others. 4.4 Feedback as Dialogue: Feedback should not end the discussion, but extend it. For instance, “That’s an interesting point—how does it relate to yesterday’s lesson?” 4.5 Encouraging Student Questions: Creating a classroom culture where students feel safe to ask questions fosters curiosity and autonomy. 5. Sociocultural Dimensions of Classroom Communication https://scientific-jl.com 1 4 9 62-son_3-to’plam_May-2025 ISSN:3030-

Доказательный фрагмент

«This article provides an in-depth analysis of the nature, function, and impact of discourse between teachers and students in educational settings.»

Образец извлечения

Демо-превью

This article provides an in-depth analysis of the nature, function, and impact of discourse between teachers and students in educational settings. Полный текст публикации CiteX не хранит — доступ к первоисточнику открывается по DOI согласно лицензии издателя и выбранному плану.

DOI не указан
Цитирований
0
Тип
Журнал
Страна
Узбекистан
Ключевые слова
classroom discourse, discourse teachers, teachers students, classroom communication, different types, types classroom, interactive discourse
Спросить CiteX об этой работе

Смежные источники