REGARDING THE PSYCHOLOGICAL CRITERIA AND FACTORS OF ORIGIN OF CONFLICTS BETWEEN YOUNG PEOPLE

Аннотация

In this article, the conflicts that arise during adolescence, the factors of their occurrence, the interests, needs, views, etc. between the parties in interpersonal relations. Problems such as the origin of conflicts and the emergence of conflicts based on these conflicts, as well as social empowerment and social empowerment are highlighted. Keywords: Adolescence, conflicts, interests, needs, social reinforcement, social reinforcement, conflict group integration. It is one of the urgent issues of our time to research this uniqueness, to study the conflicts observed in teenagers based on these situations. When defining conflicts, we pay special attention to their conflicting aspects, that is, the interests, needs, views, etc. between the parties. causes contradictions, and conflicts arise based on these contradictions. However, at this point, the question of exactly what kind of opposition can be called a conflict is relevant. And this naturally goes back to the issue of their psychological criteria. We will address these criteria below. According to a group of scientists, it is necessary to pay attention to the following situations when solving this problem (2,3,4): 1) interdependence of the parties, that is, both parties are interdependent, the activity of one person ensures the actions of the second person, and these actions call for the response reactions of the first subject, and h. in this way, the interaction of the parties occurs, their control is observed, but if there are strict rules of communication (for example, a boxer's fight), this is not a conflict; 2) awareness of the conflict of the situation, that is, one side or both sides evaluate the actions of others as hostile actions aimed at destroying the achievement of desired goals or fighting; 3) choosing the strategy of the second behavior: seeking compromise or a solution that is acceptable to both parties, or escalating the conflict, intensifying the struggle, for example, moving from the struggle of points of view (cognitive conflict) to the struggle of individuals (interpersonal conflict), then to the struggle of groups and reaping excellence. There are no guilty parties or rights in the conflict, everyone wants to achieve their goals. Conflict is a type of interaction in which the outcome affects all participants in the conflict, each person contributes to the conflict. However, 63 DEVELOPMENT AND INNOVATIONS IN SCIENCE International scientific-online conference usually a person thinks: "The conflict is not mine, the other person is to blame", "I am right, and the other person is wrong, he is bad", and each person gathers allies around him to prove his right. This is how the conflict escalates. The outcome of the conflict is not always the same. The dispute will end by itself in the case of agreement between the parties or in the case of one of the parties withdrawing from the conflict, as well as in the case of reconciliation due to the intervention of third parties. As noted above, conflict is an exaggerated form of contradictions, but at the same time, it serves as a way of identifying and resolving contradictions. In this sense, the question arises: what causes the conflict, what are the stages of its development? It can be answered as follows: the conflict is caused by an objective life situation created by the opposite parties, and these parties themselves have certain interests, needs, and goals. Naturally, the non- recognition of some needs of one side by the other forms the socio-psychological basis of the conflict. This itself is a structure of contradictions, and it creates a conflict situation that has not turned into a conflict. Thus, a conflict situation is such a complex of human needs and interests that creates the ground for a real struggle between different social subjects. The subject of the dispute is such a fundamental contradiction that the parties enter into a struggle for this reason and to resolve this contradiction. During the conflict, as the disagreement is resolved, a way out of the impasse is sought, and then the question of the function of the conflict is raised - positive or negative, good or bad. In other words, is conflict good or bad? Here, from our usual point of view, we give a causal answer, because the conflict always takes the form of family quarrels and disagreements, service anxieties, inter-ethnic, territorial, socio-political antagonisms, sufferings and losses. Based on this, it has become a habit to look at the conflict as a negative event. However, if you look closely at the essence of this problem, you will see a different perspective, a different ageism. Based on this, the conflict can be considered not only a negative social phenomenon, but also a positive one. Our opinion here is as follows: indeed, conflict is an unpleasant, unwanted phenomenon that begins to erode a normally functioning social system, but in the course of the conflict, such forces appear that can restore peace and tranq