The Expression of Causative, Resultative and Ditransitive Constructions in English And Uzbek Languages

Аннотация

In the sphere of aspectual semantics, relevance plays an important role in special research due to the diversity of methods and means of expression. This is because resilience is also characterized by the ability to be expressed in specific units and structures. This led to the selection of resilience as a separate research object. On a constructional approach, we can understand aspects of the final interpretation involving caused motion, intended transfer, or caused result to be contributed by the respective constructions. That is, we can understand skeletal constructions to be capable of contributing arguments. For example, we can define the ditransitive construction to be associated directly with agent, patient, and recipient roles, and then associate the class of verbs of creation with the ditransitive construction. We do not need to stipulate a specific sense of bake unique to this construction. In general, we can understand the direct objects found in the above examples to be licensed not directly as arguments of the verbs but by the particular constructions. Keywords: Construction, semantics, resultative, inchoative, iterative, depictive, causative, morphological, syntactic, lexical connections, secondary predicate. although the forms are very close to each other. In Introduction: Constructions play a main role in the some cases, the meanings of causality and resultability study of syntax and semantics binding. The term or causality and depictivity may be embodied within a construction is used in relation to linguistic expression, structure. Structures are the basic unit that gives a which has a plan and meaning of expression. Language practical expression to each language. In the units and combinations of any level with content and construction of the structures that make up certain form are considered a structure, and its elements can expressions, an element is considered to be a structure also be a morpheme, a word, a combination, a if it is set in the constructive approach to the study of sentence. Thus, causative expression, ratio, ratio- language units are understood types of analysis, which specific combinations, resultative, inchoative, iterative include causative actions, purposeful transformation, expressions can be an example of the aspectual results resulting from causation, complex structure. In our analysis, attention is paid to the complementary meanings. It is obtained as a specific resultative, causative, passive, depictive structures. template using certain morphological, syntactic, lexical The reason these structures are in shape and content connections. For example, in transitive verb structures, close to each other is that they form a large group. the functions performed directly by agents, patients, Literature review and the addressee, and to which verb class they are In resultative, ditransitive, causative structures, the associated, are important. In general, intransitive fillers lexical basis of the verb, the syntactic connection, has are not considered as a direct verb argument, but as a the same appearance. Resultative, ditransitive, structure. causative structures differ in their semantic feature, International Journal Of Literature And Languages 20 https://theusajournals.com/index.php/ijll International Journal Of Literature And Languages (ISSN: 2771-2834) Analysis an important role in the formation of resultant structures logically related to the capabilities of In many languages, the structures associated with another. The author gives the example of “a gun hanger causality and resultability has been studied on the wall”. It is argued that static quality has formed syntactically and semantically separately. Researchers productive structures as a predicate. In the example of differentiate causal and expressive expressions the rifle hanging on the next wall, it is noted that the according to their intensive, functional, physical, and perfect meaning of the verb in the form of the passive linguistic characteristics (V.P. Nedyalkov, 1983). The pronoun is formed. expression of causatve, as well as of resultability, varies according to the morphological, syntactic formation of DISCUSSION each language. In some languages, these phenomena In syntactic typology, the term "resultative" is applied have a morphological index, a syntactic form, while in to a secondary predicate in successive structures. For others they have a lexical feature. Lexical feature is also example: The lake froze solid, He shoot her dead. The a feature of morphologically formed languages. term resilience refers to the expected outcome of Because sometimes causative and resultability occur transformative processes. Resultative and depictive directly in relation to the lexical and semantic nature of structures are close in form. The depictive meaning the verb. Morphologically and syntactically, they are a expressed in the cut of a sentence is usually formed in feature of certain languages. In these structure