Distinctive Characteristics of Intertextual Anthroponyms

Аннотация

This article presents reflections on the distinctive features of anthroponyms, their classification, functions within literary texts, the influence of intertextual anthroponyms on the national culture, and their specific significance. Views on the intertextual transfer of anthroponyms are analyzed. It is observed that the most common anthroponyms in fiction are associated with human mental activity and consciousness, and their conceptualization is rooted in humanity's experiences from both distant and recent past. When comparing intertextual anthroponyms in the Uzbek language, it is highlighted that names in works created across different periods form an interconnected intertextual system without losing their value over time, demonstrating their interdependence. The reasons for this phenomenon are attributed to people's cognitive knowledge, as well as the experiences, culture, and traditions of the people, which have helped determine the origins of intertextual anthroponyms. Keywords: Intertextual anthroponym, intertextuality, poetonym, era, culture, cognitive consciousness, artistic intention, pseudonym, nickname. Introduction: Today, the Uzbek language fulfills a major Therefore, it is crucial to study the scientific and social function as a tool for the exchange of ideas cultural heritage of great ancestors, the history of the among the Uzbek nation. The contributions of our national language's relationship with other languages, linguists, writers, and poets to the current and the extent to which the linguistic worldview and development of the Uzbek language are invaluable. the native speaker's thinking, perception, and values Thanks to their great efforts, strict norms have been are reflected in lexical units. established in many areas of the Uzbek language, and Uzbek onomastics is currently a well-developed field, linguistic examples of language units in the and numerous studies have been conducted on the communication process are recommended. Many monographic study of Uzbek anthroponymy. Scientific issues in language development have been placed on a works on the study of Uzbek anthroponyms have been scientific and theoretical foundation. Granting the carried out by E.Begmatov, G.Sattorov, S.Rakhimov, Uzbek language, the status of state language has set and others. the task of a deeper and more comprehensive study of The term “poetonym” is used to denote names used in our language's lexicon and its grammatical structure. a work of art. This term was first used in 1956 by V.M. Special attention is given to collecting and researching Mikhailov. Later, S.I. Zinin paid special attention to this information about proper nouns, which occupy a term and conducted a number of studies. These studies central place in the vocabulary of the Uzbek language. are also important in that they regulated the Onomastic issues have been relevant for each period. terminology of this field, and “poetonym” is Uzbek onomastics has undergone specific stages of understood not as any onomastic unit, but only as development. In particular, studying the development names that have an artistic load and poetic value. of anthroponyms at the beginning of the 20th century METHODS provides important scientific insights for Uzbek onomastics. Anthroponyms are a linguistic tool that helps to quickly American Journal Of Social Sciences And Humanity Research 140 https://theusajournals.com/index.php/ajsshr American Journal Of Social Sciences And Humanity Research (ISSN: 2771-2141) and easily understand the aesthetic essence of a work, often used as intertextual text elements and have serving as a unique bridge between the writer and the linguopoetic value as allusive names. (Andaniyozova, reader. Skilled writers make effective use of this tool. 2017. 12). Such units are linguopoetically adapted to perform The allusive names Otabek and Kumush were used in specific functions. Additionally, anthropoetonyms the following example to exaggerate the state of love possess special semantic and aesthetic features. of the lyrical hero: Writers, while imbuing the hero's name with Marg‘ilonda Kumushni ko‘rdim, information related to their actions and character, also infuse it with their own worldview (Andaniyozova, Ko‘ziga yosh olib turibdi. 2017. 13). Sochlarini maydalab o‘rib, The migration of anthroponyms between texts is a Otabekni kutib yuribdi. (Muhammad Yusuf). cognitive process that indicates the presence or Asardagi kundoshlik holatiga ishora qilinyapti: absence of knowledge in people's cognitive Bilmam, nima edi maqsading: consciousness. For instance, we might name our children after someone who lived before us because of Menga bir juft guling asrading, their admirable qualities. This phenomenon can also be Birin otin Kumush atading, observed in literary works. Birin ismin Zaynab qo‘yding-ku To clearly understand the writer’s or poet’s purpose in (Muhammad Yusuf,). a text, we need information about the semantics of intertextual anthroponyms. Iden