К содержанию
РецензированоEN2025

Morphophonological Processes and Their Phonetic, Phonological, And Morthographic Representations: A Comparative Analysis of Korean And Uzbek

PAGE NO. - · Morphophonological Processes · Their Phonetic · And Morthographic Representations: A · Melikova Uljon Burxonovna

American Journal of Philological Sciences · 05 · 51-60 · 2025

Аннотация

This article investigates the morphophonological processes in Korean and Uzbek, focusing on their phonetic realization, phonological patterns, and orthographic representations. Through comparative analysis, the study explores assimilation, dissimilation, elision, and metathesis, illustrating the interplay between morphemes and phonemes. The paper also highlights how these processes are graphically encoded in two typologically distinct writing systems, revealing implications for linguistic theory and language pedagogy. Keywords: Morphophonology, phonetics, phonology, orthography, Korean language, Uzbek language, assimilation, elision, comparative linguistic. Introduction: Morphophonological processes • Korean: 국밥 /kukpap/ → [kukp͈ap] (regressive represent a dynamic interface between morphology assimilation and gemination due to final consonant + and phonology. These processes are crucial in plosive interaction). understanding how morphemes adapt phonetically • Uzbek: kitob+lar → [kitoblar] (no change), but during word formation. While Korean and Uzbek in fast speech: [kitollar]. belong to different language families—Korean being a language isolate and Uzbek a Turkic language—they Dissimilation exhibit intriguing morphophonological behaviors that • Korean: Rare, but found in historical changes reflect universal phonological tendencies and and dialectal variation. language-specific strategies. • Uzbek: Examples include hypercorrection or This study draws upon the frameworks of generative avoidance of repetition, e.g., tutmoq becoming phonology (Chomsky & Halle, 1968) and Natural tushmoq in colloquial speech. Phonology (Stampe, 1973), incorporating cross- Elision linguistic perspectives on morphophonemic alternations. Additionally, the analysis considers the • Korean: 좋다 /chot’a/ → [chota] (‘ㅎ’ elided in influence of writing systems on the perception and casual speech). preservation of these processes. • Uzbek: bo‘libdi → bopti (vowel and consonant Phonetic realization in Korean is highly influenced by elision). syllable-final consonants (batchim), tone, and pitch Metathesis accent, while Uzbek exhibits more regular phoneme realization. Phonologically, Uzbek stresses the • Korean: Minimal, mainly dialectal. penultimate or final syllable, whereas Korean relies on • Uzbek: Found in older or dialectal forms, e.g., intonation rather than stress. barmoğ → barmoq. Morphophonological Processes in Korean and Uzbek Assimilation American Journal Of Philological Sciences 146 https://theusajournals.com/index.php/ajps American Journal Of Philological Sciences (ISSN – 2771-2273) Korean Hangul is morphophonemic but allows for sounds. Phonetic sounds are actual speech sounds, systematic phonological variation. Characters are which may not always carry meaning by themselves. In arranged into blocks that visually reflect syllabic contrast, phonemes are abstract representations that structure. Uzbek orthography, based on the Latin can change the meaning of words. For instance: script, more directly represents phonemes but often • In the Korean word "불" (pul, meaning fire) and fails to capture morphophonemic alternations. "이불" (ibul, meaning blanket), the difference between Example: the p and b sounds is phonetic but does not change the • Korean: 읽다 (to read) → pronounced [익따] meaning. • Uzbek: yurak+im → yuragim (voicing of [k] to • Similarly, in the words "날" (nal) meaning "day" [g]) and "나라" (nara) meaning "country," the n sound in The passage you provided explains fundamental both words is the same and does not change the concepts in phonology, specifically about phonemes meaning, making it a phonetic difference, not a and their role in distinguishing word meanings, as well phonemic one. as the distinction between phonemes and phonetic sounds. In summary, while phonetic sounds might differ, it is the phonemes—those units of sound that lead to a Phonology and Phonemes change in meaning—that are the focus of phonological Phonology is the branch of linguistics that deals with analysis. the study of phonemes, the smallest units of sound that Understanding morphophonological alternations aids distinguish meaning in a language. Phonemes in more effective language teaching and machine themselves are abstract units and do not exist in processing of languages. For language learners, isolation in speech. Their realizations in actual speech recognizing predictable patterns can improve reading are called allophones or variant phonemes. and pronunciation. For linguists, such comparative data Phoneme and Allophone supports theories of universality and language-specific A phoneme is defined as the smallest sound unit in a variation. language that can change the meaning of a word. For

Доказательный фрагмент

«This article investigates the morphophonological processes in Korean and Uzbek, focusing on their phonetic realization, phonological patterns, and orthographic representations.»

Образец извлечения

Демо-превью

This article investigates the morphophonological processes in Korean and Uzbek, focusing on their phonetic realization, phonological patterns, and orthographic representations. Полный текст публикации CiteX не хранит — доступ к первоисточнику открывается по DOI согласно лицензии издателя и выбранному плану.

Цитирований
0
Тип
Журнал
Страна
Узбекистан
Ключевые слова
Morphophonology, phonetics, phonology, orthography, Korean language, Uzbek language
Открыть DOI
Спросить CiteX об этой работе

Смежные источники