Synonymy and variants of phraseological units with the component “clothing”

Аннотация

The given article touches upon the issues of synonymy and variants of phraseological united under the component “Clothing” in English, Russian and Uzbek languages. In distinguishing between the terms of synonymy and variants it has been approached to the views of different scholars. The equivalence of phraseological units has also been considered. Keywords: Phraseological units, component “Clothing”, synonym, variant, expressiveness, equivalence. capacity is of particular interest. In addition to lexical Introduction: Phraseological synonymy plays a items, phraseological and paremiological units, significant role in enriching the phraseological fund of enriched by their own synonymous forms, also any language, as it reveals the semantic-paradigmatic contribute to the expansion of the lexical layer of the relationships among phraseological units. It is language. One concept, object, or state can be important to distinguish phraseological synonymy from described and conveyed in multiple ways, employing the phenomenon of phraseological variants, a different methods and expressive tools. distinction that has been examined in detail. Phraseological units containing the component Hence, the language features a considerable number of “clothing” (“kiyim”) have been analyzed from a phraseological units that are close in meaning. comparative-contrastive perspective in English, However, the phraseological units that form a Russian, and Uzbek, thereby highlighting both their synonymous set do not necessarily originate within the divergent and convergent features. same era or region. For instance, two phraseological expressions containing the component “kiyim” METHODS (“clothing”) reflect a single, similar meaning: Два The issue of phraseological synonymy has been сапога пара (“two of a kind”; lit. “two boots make a thoroughly examined in English, Russian, and Uzbek pair”) and Одного сукна епанча (“a cape made from linguistics. In particular, in English studies, it was the same cloth”). While the first unit is tied to Russian addressed by A. V. Kunin [4], in Russian by T. A. customs, the second appears to be borrowed from the Bertagayev and V. I. Zimin [1], and in Uzbek linguistics, Tatar language. The notion of “taking someone else’s aspects of phraseological synonymy have drawn the money” is represented by a set of phraseological units attention of Sh. Rahmatullayev [5]. The researcher in Russian: класть в карман (“to pocket”), залезть в emphasized that phraseological synonyms, based on карман (“to dig into someone’s pocket”), запускать varying imagery, should nevertheless convey the same руку в карман (“to put one’s hand into someone’s concepts and identical meanings [3]. In this article, pocket”), набивать карман (“to line one’s pockets”). phraseological units containing the component Another series of expressions illustrates a lack of “clothing” (“kiyim”) in English, Russian, and Uzbek are money: В кармане вошь на аркане, В кармане ветер analyzed from a comparative-contrastive perspective, свистит, В кармане ветер гуляет, Карманная чахотка including a detailed examination of their components. (“there’s a louse on a leash in one’s pocket,” “the wind RESULTS AND DISCUSSION whistles in one’s pocket,” “the wind blows through When language manifests through various linguistic one’s pocket,” “pocket consumption (tuberculosis),” units, the emergence of these units in a synonymous respectively). While the lexeme pocket metaphorically American Journal Of Philological Sciences 144 https://theusajournals.com/index.php/ajps American Journal Of Philological Sciences (ISSN – 2771-2273) denotes money or means, the images of a louse (вошь), by numerous scholars. For example, to distinguish consumption (чахотка), and whistling wind (ветер phraseological synonyms from variants, Sh. свистит) convey negative connotations, signifying Rahmatullayev cites the following key criteria: the poverty. In each case, the phraseological units reveal internal integrity of the phrase’s form, the uniformity associative links: the social ills of lice and tuberculosis of its expressive coloring and semantic unity, its metaphorically represent a decline in one’s material identical functional usage, and the absence of stylistic status, while the whistling wind is compared to a divergence. portrait of destitution. Thus, phraseological units, even Russian linguists V. P. Zhukov and A. V. Zhukov offer when synonymous, can reflect different cultural and definitions of phraseological synonymy that closely historical layers. Their figurative motives (e.g., illness, align with Sh. Rahmatullayev’s views [2]. In their parasitic creatures, or the howling wind) demonstrate interpretation, phraseological synonymy involves units how speakers conceptualize financial hardship and that are similar in meaning and belong to the same part material insufficiency. At the same time, these close-in- of speech category, yet differ in stylistic coloring and meaning phraseologic