Особенности процедуры и применения меры процессуального принуждения в виде заключения под стражу в опыте некоторых зарубежных стран

Аннотация

Калит сўзлар: Мақолада процессуал мажбурлов чораларидан бири ушлаб туриш, ушлаб туришнинг тартиби ҳамда қўлланилиши юзасидан ҳибсга олиш, айрим чет давлатларнинг тажрибаси ўрганилган. Ушлаб ордер, туриш процессуал мажбурлов чораси хорижий фактик ушлаш, гумон, мамлакатлар ҳуқуқни муҳофаза қилиш фаолиятида ҳам жиноят, қўлланилиши, унинг айрим ўзига хос жиҳатлари илмий процессуал мажбурлов. таҳлил қилинган. Ушлаб туришнинг шахс ҳуқуқ ва 1 PhD Student, Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Republic of Uzbekistan. E-mail: bilolovabbosbek@gmail.com Жамият ва инновациялар – Общество и инновации – Society and innovations Special Issue – 02 (2025) / ISSN 2181-1415 эркинликларини чеклаш билан боғлиқлиги, жиноий ҳодиса юзасидан кечиктириб бўлмайдиган вазиятларга хослиги, шунингдек ушлаб туришнинг жиноят содир этишда гумон қилинувчи сифатида ушланган шахснинг жиноий фаолиятини давом эттиришини олдини олишдаги аҳамиятига оид муҳим масалалар ёритиб ўтилган. Особенности процедуры и применения меры процессуального принуждения в виде заключения под стражу в опыте некоторых зарубежных стран АННОТАЦИЯ Ключевые слова: В статье исследуется порядок проведения одной из мер задержание, процессуального принуждения, а также анализируется арест, опыт некоторых зарубежных стран по её применению. ордер, Мера процессуального принуждения в виде заключения фактическое задержание, подозрение, под стражу используется в правоохранительной преступление, деятельности зарубежных стран, и её специфические процессуальное аспекты были научно проанализированы. Рассмотрены принуждение. важные вопросы, касающиеся связи задержания с ограничениями прав и свобод личности, особенностей ситуаций, требующих незамедлительного реагирования в связи с уголовным происшествием, а также значимости задержания подозреваемого для предотвращения продолжения преступной деятельности. Detention as one of the measures of procedural coercion is important for the rapid and complete detection of crimes, the imposition of fair punishment on each person who has committed a crime, as well as the strengthening of the rule of law, the prevention of crime, and the protection of the interests of the individual, the State and society. Because detention is used to prevent a criminal suspect from engaging in criminal activity, fleeing, concealing or destroying evidence. The application of a measure of procedural coercion is also provided by the criminal procedural legislation of foreign countries in its essential importance. The norms of detention, as noted in the legislation of foreign countries, differ in some specific aspects, although their basis, procedure of application, and duration are similar. In a developed State, detention in the United States of America is expressed [1] in the form of “detention” and is used with the authorization of the court due to the significant restriction of individual rights under the Constitution. In many cases, the procedural and coercive measure involves short-term imprisonment. Procedural and coercive measures related to such short-term deprivation of liberty are also applied to persons who have committed crimes of minor gravity (intoxication in a public place, drunk driving, violation of public order and rules of alcohol trade, etc.). Longer prison sentences apply to persons suspected of committing dangerous crimes. A scholar in the field of criminal procedure law, Professor G. Tulganova, touched upon another aspect of US criminal procedure law, which is that the police must gather the necessary factual information and file a motion to take a certain person into custody in order to take a 216 Жамият ва инновациялар – Общество и инновации – Society and innovations Special Issue – 02 (2025) / ISSN 2181-1415 criminal suspect into custody. At the same time, in cases that cannot be delayed, it is permissible to be caught or imprisoned without a warrant, but in that case, in order to test the legality of the imprisonment, the requirement to bring the person in custody “as soon as practicable” before a court must be met [2]. A from scholars who have studied the U.S. criminal justice system. Т. Goltsov emphasized the fact that the legislation of the state in question does not provide for the very institution that could be called a “suspect”. In contrast, the use of the term “alleged offender” has been raised in the United States In contrast, the use of the term “alleged offender”, most commonly interpreted as “accused”, has been raised in the United States [3]. In the United States, police must also follow a number of rules that are set forth in laws and bylaws. Specifically, a police officer may search a suspect and obtain weapons, items that may be considered evidence in a case. The prisoner is then taken to the place where they are being held and their imprisonment is formalized. During this clearance, information is entered into the police logbook about the suspect's name, time of arrival, what he or she is suspected of doing, then a