LINGUOCULTURAL ASPECT OF PHRASEOLOGICAL UNITS OF THE UZBEK LANGUAGE

Аннотация

В данной статье рассматривается лингвокультурологический аспект фразеологических единиц узбекского языка. Лингвокультурологический подход к изучению языковых явлений как единиц, отражающих национальную специфику народа, является актуальным наданномэтаперазвития языкознания. Ключевые слова: лингвокультурология, миропонимание, миросозерцание, мировидение, коннотация, фразеологические единицы, национально-культурная специфика, архетип, мифология. Introduction. The linguocultural approach to the study of linguistic phenomena as units reflecting the national specificity of the people is relevant at this stage of linguistics development. Research in this field is very relevant in our time, and within its framework various aspects of the national- cultural specificity of language considered both in general theoretical terms and in specific studies devoted to the study of national-cultural features in the field of lexicon and idiomatic, as well as key concepts of different languages and cultures. Recently, a lot written about linguoculturology, despite its “youth”. That is probably why there is no universally accepted definition, no single opinion on the status, subject and methods of linguoculturology. The theoretical and methodological basis of this discipline is currently at the stage of formation. The generally accepted definition of linguocultural study as the study of language in inseparable connection with culture. In general, it defined as follows: Linguoculturology is a science that “emerged at the intersection of linguistics and cultural studies and investigates the manifestations of people's culture that are reflected and fixed in language”The manifestations of culture are most fully reflected and fixed in phraseological units of language. Phraseological units “show” the history of culture, its modern manifestations. The cultural component of phraseological units related to pragmatics. The attribution of the cultural component to pragmatics determined first by the fact that the subject of speech and its addressee are always subjects of culture. One ofthe basic concepts oflinguoculturology is the cultural connotation of linguisticunits. “Cultural connotation is,in themost general form, the interpretation of denotative or figurative motivated, quasi-denotative, and aspects of meaning in the categories of culture. Applied to the units of the phraseological composition of the language as signs of secondary nomination, the characteristic feature of which is image-situational motivation, which is directly related to the worldview of the people - the native speaker of the language, the mediastinum of cultural connotation, and its main nerve isthis figurativebasis”. The internal form of phraseological units, which is thecarrier of motivation, often contains elements of the national-cultural plan, as phraseological units arise based on “an imaginative representation of reality, reflecting mainly everyday-empirical, historical and spiritual experience of the language collective, associated with its cultural traditions”. Each nation has special, inherent only to it ways 368 INTERNATIONAL MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL FOR RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT SJIF2019:5.2222020:5.5522021:5.6372022:5.4792023:6.5632024:7,805 eISSN:2394-6334 https://www.ijmrd.in/index.php/imjrd Volume12,issue02(2025) of world perception, worldview and worldview, which create the basis of national assessment of the realities of the surrounding reality. Phraseology is one of the ways of linguistic worldview, which gives grounds to speak about the existence of aphraseological picture oftheworld in each language. The means of embodying the cultural-national specificity of phraseological units is the figurative basis, the internal form of the phraseological unit. The way of indicating cultural-national specificity is “interpretation of the figurative basis in the sign cultural-national ‘space’ of the given linguistic community”. It noted that there is no direct correlation between culture and language: a presupposition (previously acquired knowledge) can be “placed” between them as a key to interpretation. It is impossible to interpret the content of the cultural connotation contained in a phraseology without a presupposition. This is a very important methodological position. For example, to understand the meaning of the phraseology alifni kaltak deyolmaslik (literally, not to distinguish alif from stick) - about an illiterate, ignorant person - one should know the Arabic alphabet, which was used for a long time by the peoples of Central Asia among others. Alif is the first letter of this alphabet, which resembles a stick in shape. This turn is an indicator of the epoch when the entire literate population of Movarennahr used the Arabic alphabet. To understand the meaning of the phraseologism ammamning buzog’i (dek) (lit. “like aunt's calf”), it is necessary to know, at least in general terms, the national-cultural uniqueness of the peoples of Central Asia, in