The study of factors influencing the effectiveness of medical examination of military personnel. The level of preventive activity of military personnel. The role of information in increasing the coverage of medical examinations

Аннотация

To assess the level of preventive activity of military personnel, we will consider the factors determining this activity. According to the report on the study of the state of medical provision of the Armed Forces of the Republic of Uzbekistan, conducted jointly by specialists from the Central Military Clinical Hospital of the Ministry of Defense of the Republic of Uzbekistan and the Scientific Research Institute of Military Medicine (based on the Military Medical Academy of the Armed Forces of the Republic of Uzbekistan). Keywords: Medical Examination, Military Personnel, Military Clinical Hospital. Introduction: To assess the level of preventive activity 3) The level of medical awareness of military personnel; of military personnel, we will consider the factors 4) The level of trust in prevention; determining this activity. According to the report on 5) The level of personal attitude to health; the study of the state of medical provision of the Armed Forces of the Republic of Uzbekistan, conducted jointly 6) Vaccination rate; by specialists from the Central Military Clinical Hospital 7) Coverage of medical examinations (occupational of the Ministry of Defense of the Republic of Uzbekistan examinations) in % of the regulated amount; and the Scientific Research Institute of Military 8) Medical examination coverage (stage 1) in % of the Medicine (based on the Military Medical Academy of regulations; the Armed Forces of the Republic of Uzbekistan), such 9) Medical examination coverage (stage 2) in % of the factors are: regulations. 1) Health level; Designation of factors in statistical calculations: 2) The level of availability of preventive care; International Journal of Medical Sciences And Clinical Research 6 https://theusajournals.com/index.php/ijmscr International Journal of Medical Sciences And Clinical Research (ISSN: 2771-2265) - ZD, DPU, INF, DOV, LOZ, VC, OMO, OD1, OD2, When making calculations within the framework of respectively. factor analysis, the adequacy of its aPDlication was assessed first. The calculated measure of the adequacy The data presented in the report are the processed of the Kaiser-Mayer-Olkin (KMO) sample was 0.891, results of a survey of military personnel and their which is a very good result, which indicates a high medical indicators. The study was based on 684 military degree of aPDlicability of factor analysis. The Bartlett personnel, including 296 conscripts and 388 sphericity criterion, the significance of which is <0.05, commissioned officers and military personnel (privates, indicates the same thing. sergeants). Let us construct a correlation matrix to determine the Next, we will conduct a factor analysis to determine the degree of mutual influence of impact of each of the above nine factors on the level of preventive activity of military personnel. Table 1 – Correlation matrix ZD DPU INF DOV LOZ VC OMO OD1 OD2 ZD 0,255 0,248 0,192 0,225 0,117 0,087 0,197 0,278 DPU 0,255 0,582 0,458 0,409 0,425 0,03 0,395 0,68 INF 0,248 0,582 0,481 0,487 0,457 0,031 0,475 0,741 DOV 0,192 0,458 0,481 0,401 0,43 -0,045 0,409 0,622 LOZ 0,225 0,409 0,487 0,401 0,382 0,013 0,364 0,565 VC 0,117 0,425 0,457 0,43 0,382 0,052 0,416 0,58 OMO 0,087 0,03 0,031 -0,045 0,013 0,052 -0,003 0,034 OD1 0,197 0,395 0,475 0,409 0,364 0,416 -0,003 0,62 OD2 0,278 0,68 0,741 0,622 0,565 0,58 0,034 0,62 The relationship of factors with a correlation above 0.5 Further, the explained cumulative variance is is highlighted in color. calculated in table 2. Table 2 – Explained cumulative variance Rotation of the sum of the Component Initial eigenvalues squares of the loads % of % of Total Totals % Total Totals % Variance Variance 1 4,116 45,735 45,735 1,118 12,42 12,42 2 1,051 11,681 57,416 1,113 12,37 24,791 3 0,886 9,847 67,263 1,091 12,117 36,908 4 0,641 7,123 74,386 1,085 12,057 48,965 5 0,607 6,747 81,133 1,08 12,001 60,966 6 0,576 6,397 87,53 1,078 11,982 72,948 7 0,543 6,035 93,565 1,027 11,413 84,361 8 0,399 4,431 97,996 1,002 11,128 95,489 9 0,18 2,004 100 0,406 4,511 100 The table shows that 8 factors explain 98% of the variance. International Journal of Medical Sciences And Clinical Research 7 https://theusajournals.com/index.php/ijmscr International Journal of Medical Sciences And Clinical Research (ISSN: 2771-2265) Figure 1 – Eigenvalues of the components In order to understand which of the initial factors the inverted component matrix. corresponds to a particular component, we calculate Table 3 – Inverted matrix of components 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ZD 0,983 DPU 0,147 0,904 0,181 0,232 0,166 0,155 0,112 0,103 INF 0,199 0,255 0,189 0,872 0,182 0,207 0,104 0,115 DOV 0,161 0,175 0,919 0,17 0,173 0,156 LOZ 0,135 0,147 0,151 0,178 0,145 0,932 VC 0,169 0,158 0,169 0,16 0,928 0,147 OMO 0,998 OD1 0,932 0,138 0,154 0,171 0,166 0,134 OD2 0,334 0,356 0,311 0,388 0,279 0,269 0,122 0,591 It can be seen from the table. That the most significant are: component 1 corresponds to the factor of Medical The level of availability