COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF LEGAL TERMS IN ENGLISH AND UZBEK LANGUAGE

Аннотация

англоязычная юридическая терминология, классификация терминов, язык нормативно-правовых документов, юридический термин, терминология, терминологическая система, сравнительно-научный анализ. Ключевые слова: английская юридическая терминология, классификация терминов, простые нормативно-правовые документы, правильная терминология, терминологическая система, сравнительный анализ. Legal terminology not only professional environment, perhaps speech of communication another also wide in fields is used, therefore the right for language special purposes learning necessity was born Legal terminology to himself special unrepeatable research object is because it is different terms to the system than application of the fields extremely diversity with separate stands. Law acceptance to do very big that required strength and complicated process that it was such as terms comparative research there is a lot to do complicated task is considered Because in this of terms alone not but different legal systems compared (as it is known, of Uzbekistan codified the right and Anglo-American 135 ACADEMIC RESEARCH IN MODERN SCIENCE International scientific-online conference precedent the right in the middle big difference there is being, this terms level is also evident to the eye thrown away). Dictionary alternative most of the time lexicon unity about right imagination because it does not wake up two in the language mutually alternative terms different concepts or one -, to one near was, but meaning of the scope differently the fact that with distinguishable concepts represents For example, the word " prosecutor" is translated as " procurator ". will be done, however this occupation of owners America and Uzbekistan the right in the system duties mutually suitable does not come, the word "prosecutor". heard of the American imagination Uzbek in the language talkative the word " prosecutor " in person wake up from imagination difference does. This attitude with, our in our opinion, separate of terms comparative analysis done increase and them English from the language Uzbek to the language or Uzbek from the language English to the language translation to do ways just statement by doing to give not but of law separately to the fields about terminological of systems complex contrastive research done increase necessary. For this, first of all, the term of the tongue dictionary in the system status and him the term didn't happen from lexemes distinguishing signs identify get necessary F. de Saussure of terms in general consumption from words separate standing main feature as follows explains: «As a symbol word unfounded, free to nature have, term while special semiotic to the system about is a symbol (symbol), nominative-definitive (nominative and descriptor) to the task possessive: nominative of being because is that it is of meanings common from the system separate received whole and complicated the part means» [1, 285]. 1. F. de Saussure word and the term in comparison of the term the following features separate shows: 2. Meaning separately subject or to the event not, objects or events class or type relatedness; 3. Household concepts or common to imaginations it's not rather, scientific or technical to concepts relatedness; 4. Terminology strictly defined terms system within in practice to be ie of the term always terms system one piece to be 5. From existence very abstraction, even from him the whole until the break to go 6. Terminology certain knowledge and requiring education known professional activity with dependence. 136 ACADEMIC RESEARCH IN MODERN SCIENCE International scientific-online conference Listed differences linguists by determined. Now it 's legal of terms to himself special features about issue solution reach for how criteria before their push analysis by doing we will see. SP Khijnyak's " Yuridicheskaya terminology: formation i in the fundamental research " sostav ". lawyers by to term found relevant characters classification given Author's to his opinion according to, terms the following properties have to be should: 1. The only one, that is certain the law or another normative in the document one different in a sense application, one system single meaning within express necessary; 2. Law creator by only certain condition without being discovered, on the contrary generally accepted done to be must, the term some kind of separately in a sense apply possible it's not; 3. Stable to be, that is of the term content and meaning to the context depends respectively immutability necessary; 4. Certain in the system another terms with makes sense connected to be 5. Professional field within application [2, 137]. Above given characters groups in comparison lawyers and linguists in the concept the term similar also has criteria to be although different things represents Lawyers concept wider because they are the law in the texts his own main panlinguistic in the sense of applicable also term the words category they enter Such le