The history and theoretical interpretations of dialogue in literary studies

Аннотация

The article examines the history of dialogue in literary studies and its theoretical interpretations. On the example of world and Uzbek literary studies, theoretical views on the issues of dialogue and its artistic function, its significance in poetic speech are summarized. Scientific conclusions are drawn about the function and essence of artistic dialogue. Keywords: Literary studies, dialogue, theory, scientific school, poetic speech, artistic function. Ancient Greek sources already recognized that it also Introduction: The roots of dialogue are considered to encompassed meanings such as the relationship be an ancient phenomenon, dating back to the first between two viewpoints, the interaction of opposing periods of interpersonal communication. It existed in forces, and debates between two poles. the "pre-literary period," just as it existed before philosophy. According to experts, the first form of The dialogue presented in Plato’s Symposium between dialogue was social in nature. In a social environment Socrates and Agathon illustrates the strong foundation where two people are together, there is a need for of this idea. Socrates, who visits the poet Agathon’s dialogue and mutual communication. This is the reason home specifically for a conversation, is asked several why the practice of dialogue and the theoretical questions by his host about God and His role in human interpretations related to it are diverse, numerous and life. Receiving satisfactory and logically inspiring ancient. If the first examples of social dialogue answers from Socrates, Agathon becomes inspired and appeared in the form of communication between God begins to ask poetic questions (which experts regard as and man, man and woman, father and son, then one of the earliest examples of poetic dialogue in gradually it branched out in the form of communication philosophy). between ruler and citizen, judge and condemned, Socrates, admiring the meaning and metaphor in teacher and student, preacher and listener, etc. More Agafon's poem, says to him: "You praised Eroth. Does it precisely, dialogue has existed as a condition of social merely merit praise, or does it have flaws?" Agafon life in every aspect of human life, and this process cannot answer this question. Recognizing his defeat, he continues at a consistent pace today. said, "You're too strong. I can't argue with you!". METHOD Socrates then responded to Agafón: "No, you cannot argue with the truth, not with me, because it is Based on the available materials, it can be said that the impossible to argue with the truth." From the given initial formalized forms of dialogue emerged in ancient small text, it becomes clear that during the processes Greece, particularly in interactions related to religious- of historical formation of dialogue, it showed a number mythological, philosophical, scientific, and judicial of specific features: a) dialogue is not just a simple contexts. From a semantic perspective, the term conversation between two people; b) it is built on a “dialogue” (from the Greek dialogos – “a conversation discussion that reflects the position of a specific between two or more people, a form of verbal person; c) it is in harmony with poetic expression even communication”) [Словарь. 9:67] is not limited to in ancient forms of communication; d) the leadership simply “a conversation between two or more of logic and observation in dialogue. individuals,” as commonly defined in dictionaries. American Journal Of Philological Sciences 8 https://theusajournals.com/index.php/ajps American Journal Of Philological Sciences (ISSN – 2771-2273) In order to confirm this classification, we consider it falsehood. Here, the strong logic of Socrates' words necessary to cite the following thoughts of the literary served to expose the Sophist's lies. At the same time, in critic U. Zhurakulov on the history of dialogue: "Even the dialogue presented, the lowest level of deceit is before M. Bakhtin, the concept of dialogue and vividly reflected in the adjectives "master of words," opinions about it existed in works on philosophy, "foolishness of fools." Based on such processes aesthetics, and literary studies. In the early periods of characteristic of the history of philosophy and European philosophical and artistic thought - in the aesthetics, it can be concluded that the first works of Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle - it is clear that interpretations, evaluations, and relationships in the dialogue, in addition to its use within a specific literary theory of dialogue took place within dialogical genre, is the leading form of expression of philosophical processes, as a living process. The first manifestations thought. When the philosopher expressed his views, of of interpretation are directly related to the work of course, he felt the need for an interlocutor who would Aristotle. Although Aristotle did not write a direct encourage him to think, argue, and confirm some of his refutation of his teach