К содержанию
РецензированоEN2022

Types of omission and addition in simultaneous interpretation

Мухриддин Умаралиев

Переводоведение: проблемы, решения и перспективы · 237-238 · 2022

Аннотация

Omission in simultaneous interpretation, known as an incomplete rendition of the information present in the source language, has long been a contentious issue. Altman (1994), Barik (1994), Gile (1995; 1999) as well as Setton (1999) have perceived omission in simultaneous interpreting either as a mistake or as a technique that interpreters may use only in extremely difficult conditions, when experiencing cognitive overload. Furthermore, Viaggio (2002), Visson (2005) and Pym (2008) draw attention to the pragmatic approach to omission, treating it as a conscious decision made by the interpreter rather than a mistake resulting from miscomprehension.

Доказательный фрагмент

«Omission in simultaneous interpretation, known as an incomplete rendition of the information present in the source language, has long been a contentious issue.»

Образец извлечения

Демо-превью

Omission in simultaneous interpretation, known as an incomplete rendition of the information present in the source language, has long been a contentious issue. Полный текст публикации CiteX не хранит — доступ к первоисточнику открывается по DOI согласно лицензии издателя и выбранному плану.

DOI не указан
Цитирований
0
Тип
Журнал
Страна
Узбекистан
Ключевые слова
omission simultaneous, mistake, interpretation, known, incomplete, rendition, information
Спросить CiteX об этой работе

Смежные источники