FACTORS AFFECTING STUDENTS' STATUS IN THE GROUP

Аннотация

The article examines the socio-psychological factors that affect the state of a person in a group of students. Empirical research data on the establishment of relationships between different levels of the social-psychological condition of students in the group and the predominant types of relationships between students are presented. Key word: individuality, social environment, psychological factors, interpersonal relations. ФАКТОРЫ, ВЛИЯЮЩИЕ НА СТАТУС СТУДЕНТОВ В ГРУППЕ Аннотация. В статье рассматриваются социально-психологические факторы, влияющие на состояние личности в группе студентов. Приведены данные эмпирического исследования по установлению взаимосвязей между различными уровнями социально- психологического состояния студентов в группе и преобладающими типами взаимоотношений между студентами. Ключевые слова: индивидуальность, социальная среда, психологические факторы, межличностные отношения. Introduction: Currently, social psychology is of great interest in the study of student groups in the system of higher professional education. Researchers emphasize the high relevance of these groups for its participants, especially the importance of interpersonal relationships within the group [1-4]. Each person who is the subject of interpersonal relations enters as a system of interpersonal relations, orientations, expectations determined by the joint activities of people and the content of their communication. in various social formations, including small social groups. Relationships in small social groups affect the effectiveness of joint activities, the nature of the communication process and are characterized by selectivity and emotional tones [5]. Analysis of literature on the topic. Research on the psychological study of student group status has been conducted overseas and in the United States. Galina Mikhailovna Andreyeva is a Soviet and Russian social psychologist and sociologist who defines a group as a person whose subjects are united by certain common features, including the nature of joint activities. Artur Alexandrovich Rean is a Russian psychologist and Yakov Lvovich Kolominsky. The data obtained in social psychology do not create a complete picture of determining status differences. The characteristics of students as subjects of communication can be interpreted from the point of view of the social state of development. 1078 ResearchBib IF-2023: 11.01, ISSN: 3030-3753, Valume 1 Issue 10 The student period is characterized by a change in leading activities, a change in social status, and the entry of young people into a new social role. G.M. Andreeva [6] defines a group as a person whose subjects are united by certain common characteristics, including the nature of joint activities. Research methodology. Thus, a group is a group of people, which is characterized by the following characteristics: joint activity, structure, level of development, etc. activity is interconnected with dynamic processes within the group, perception of each other's subjects. Problems of groups and joint activities are traditionally considered in social psychology [1, 6-9]. But many issues, including the problem of the interaction mechanisms of the individual and the group, require further research. One of the important characteristics of interpersonal interaction is the position of a person in a group or status, which means the position of a person in the system of interpersonal relations and the measure of his "psychological acceptability" by group members. It can be considered as a fairly objective indicator of the success of a person's communicative activity. Ya.L. Kolominsky [1] defines status as an integral concept, which includes both objective parameters, for example, a person's position in the intragroup structure, and a subjective reflection of his own position, reflected in different degrees. Thus, in modern social psychology [1, 9] status is considered as the subject's place in the system of interpersonal relations, which determines his rights, obligations and certain privileges in the group. It is common to distinguish between business leadership and emotional leadership. The role of the instrumental "business" leader consists of actions aimed at solving the tasks assigned to each participant and the entire group, and the role of the emotional leader is related to the emotional aspects of the group's relationships]. Much of the work of researchers on the problem of sociometric status in groups was devoted to the study of the relationship between sociometric status and various individual typological characteristics, for example, extroversion, introversion, level of aggression, external attractiveness, school success, intellectual ma 014 information, age, etc. At the same time, A.A. Reana and Ya.L. Kolominsky the data obtained in social psychology do not create a complete picture of determining status differences. The available information is abundant and sometimes contradictory. The problem of individual sta