Трансформационно-дистрибутивный анализ семантического класса кто-либо пропитывает каким–либо материалом или веществом какой-либо предмет в русском и узбекском языках

Аннотация

Discourse is defined as a process of real-life communication in which systemic linguistic qualities, degree of spontaneity and completeness, thematic coherence, and clarity for other people play a significant role. It's hard to overlook the fact that human communication is always influenced by the communicants' positions. It is critical that they belong to a social group and speak in a normal manner. Discourse takes into account and reflects the specific circumstances in which and for which it was created: 1) the author's communicative intents; 2) the author's relationship with the addressees; 3) various "important" and "insignificant" conditions; 4) the ideology and stylistic climate of an era in general, the concrete environment, and specific individuals to whom the message is addressed; 5) the genre and stylistic features of the message and communicative situation; 6) associations with previous experience that brought the speech act into orbit (Karasik, 2002). These characteristics and situations, as well as supporting statements and their combination with the appropriate linguistic tools, are used to assign certain categories of discourse. Literature Review V.I. Karasik's classification of discourse is based on the criterion of direction. He distinguishes two sorts of discourse: 1) personal (personal-oriented), in which the speaker acts as an individual in all of his inner world's richness; and 2) institutional (status-oriented), in which the speaker acts as a representative of a given social rank (Karasik, 2000). P. Grays, J. Austen, J. Searle, D. Gordon, J. Lakoff, N. I. Formanovskaya, and V. S. Kubryakova all accept a similar distinction between personal and institutional speech. According to Matveeva, the criterion for classifying a discourse is straightforward: classification is based on the notions of the addresser and addressee. Communication in the form of monologue is the initial type of discourse. The second sort of communication is that which occurs within the context of status and role relationships, i.e. verbal interactions between representatives of social groups. The institutional discourse is a form of communication that takes place within the context of status and role relationships. In relation to modern society the following types of an institutional discourse are allocated: political, diplomatic, administrative, legal, military, pedagogical, religious, mystical, medical, business, advertizing, sports, scientific, scenic and mass-informational (Karasik, 2000). Classification of a political discourse We propose, first and foremost, that we address the characteristics of its discursive content when referring to political speech as a sort of institutional communication. The type of public institution, which is defined by a special term in the collective consciousness of the language and generalized in the fundamental concepts of this institution, in particular, the functioning of political speech as a power, reveals the specifics of institutional discourse (Karasik, 2000). As a result, political discourse is more than just a means of communication; it also brings together certain aims and participants. The objective and participants of a discourse are determined by the type of discourse; for example, the purpose of political speech is the conquest and derivation of power; and its participants are politicians and society. We propose that you grasp a set of all key features of a political discourse that are common to all genres of this discourse and can identify it from other types of conversation under the heading of political discourse 33