THEORETICAL AND METHODOLOGICAL BASIS OF ACHIEVING SOCIAL CONSENSUS IN ENSURING PUBLIC SECURITY

Аннотация

this article analyzes the theoretical and methodological foundations of achieving social consensus in the provision of public safety. Key words: security, public safety, consensus, social consensus, social contract, social compromise. Due to the increasing number of threats and attacks on social stability in the world, the task of developing social mechanisms aimed at achieving social consensus in ensuring public safety is becoming more urgent. The dynamic analysis of public security shows that the need to implement social contract, agreement and social compromise policy is increasing in order to ensure the stability of societies. The need to ensure public safety created an opportunity for a new approach to social conflicts. Therefore, it is important to analyze the scope and forms of manifestation of conflicts. For this reason, there is a need for political research aimed at studying the problems of achieving social consensus in the provision of public security. Important theoretical and fundamental studies are being conducted by the world's leading scientific research institutes and research centers dedicated to the issues of achieving social consensus in the provision of public safety. On the basis of these links, it is concluded that one of the important aspects of studying conflicts in the field of social relations in the provision of public safety is the issue of managing the development of dialectical conflicts in the development of society. Therefore, there is a need for a systematic study of the issues of achieving social consensus in the provision of public safety. In the new development strategy of Uzbekistan, "improving preventive mechanisms aimed at preventing factors that cause social threats, improving the social and moral environment, preventing the influence of foreign ideas and eliminating their problems through systematic work with those who have fallen under their influence"[1] is a priority and main goal. designated as one of the directions. In this way, the improvement of the mechanisms of ensuring public safety, this is not unanimity and approval of everything with one voice, but getting rid of the characteristics of rigid thinking and one-sidedness, forming the unity of 29 DEVELOPMENT OF PEDAGOGICAL TECHNOLOGIES IN MODERN SCIENCES International scientific-online conference the state and the people based on the diversity and diversity of opinions, strengthening the trust of the population in the state and society. is aimed at achieving. That's why the dialectical analysis of social consensus in ensuring public safety is gaining relevance based on new approaches. In this article, we will analyze the social necessity of ensuring public safety, preventing threats against it, the manifestation of threats and their causes, and social consequences. For this, first of all, it would be appropriate to review the content, social content of the concepts of security and public safety. Chambers' Dictionary defines "security" as "the state, means, or sense of security." This concept is explained in connection with the loss of "overcomprehensibility, anxiety", "confidence", "stability"[2]. In modern literature, the concept of "security" is considered as a system of conditions and factors that develop on the basis of the object's limitation of its functions and its internal laws [3]. Also, security is described as protection from conditions and factors that pose a threat to an individual or society [4]. It should be emphasized that many definitions given to the concept of "security" are criticized by scientists and practitioners. In our opinion, the main reason for the lack of clarity in many definitions is that the definition of the concept does not take into account risk, which is considered the dialectical opposite of security. It is the study of the causes of the occurrence of danger that allows us to give a more precise definition of the concept of "security". As stated by G.A. Atamanov, security, as its derivative, acquires meaning in connection with risk [5]. According to the author, "security" represents the state of the object in the presence of internal and external influences, which is related to the violation of the mechanism of vital existence of the system. It would not be appropriate for him to perceive any threat as a danger, security comes from overcoming danger. Russian scientist V.I. According to Dahl, the term "security" is a complex concept whose meaning seems intuitively self-explanatory. The concept of "security" has a subjective meaning according to the usual perception of people, that is, security is the state of protection of the subject from negative factors that harm him. In other words, "security" can be defined as "absence of danger" [6]. Thus, the concept of "security" can be interpreted as the absence of danger to someone or something. Today, there are different definitions of security, and their authors are based on different criteria. Sometimes it is imagined that "s