Эффективность альтернативных методов разрешения коммерческих споров: сравнительный анализ арбитража и медиации

Аннотация

Калит сўзлар: Ўзбекистон Республикасида низоларни суддан ташқари низо, ҳал этишнинг ҳар қандай турини ўз ичига оладиган муқобил низоларни ҳал қилиш, низоларни ҳал қилиш усуллари оммалашмоқда. Ушбу келишмовчиликларни ҳал мақолада низоларни ҳал қилишнинг муқобил усулларининг этиш, медиация, умумий тушунчаси, уларнинг самарадорлиги ва ўзига хос арбитраж, хусусиятлари муҳокама қилинади. Мақола, шунингдек, ҳакамлик муҳокамаси, медиация ва арбитраж каби низоларни ҳал қилишнинг ўхшашлик ва фарқлар. муқобил усулларини таққослашга бағишланган. Ушбу таҳлил орқали мазкур икки процедуралар ўртасидаги ўхшашлик ва фарқлар кўриб чиқилди. 1 Tashkent State University of Law 2 Supervisor PhD Associate Professor, Department of Business Law, Tashkent State University of Law Жамият ва инновациялар – Общество и инновации – Society and innovations Special Issue – 03 (2024) / ISSN 2181-1415 Эффективность альтернативных методов разрешения коммерческих споров: сравнительный анализ арбитража и медиации АННОТАЦИЯ Ключевые слова: В Республике Узбекистан наблюдается растущая спор, популярность альтернативных методов урегулирования разрешение спора, споров, подразумевающих внесудебное их разрешение. урегулирование В данной статье освещается общее понятие конфликта, медиация, альтернативных способов разрешения споров, оценивается арбитраж, их эффективность и анализируются характерные третейское особенности. Кроме того, проводится сравнение таких разбирательство, методов, как медиация и арбитраж, что позволяет выявить сходства и различия. как общие черты, так и отличия данных процедур. At the present stage of development of civil society, the tendency towards accelerated economic development is more clearly expressed, which, together with the formation of new international and domestic relations in the field of entrepreneurship, leads to an increase in the occurrence of civil legal conflicts. By implementing a certain algorithm, it is necessary to conduct an in-depth analysis and quickly resolve the dispute that has arisen to further preserve the partnership between the parties. Until recently, appealing to the judiciary was one of the main and generally accepted ways to resolve a legal conflict between subjects of civil circulation. However, the workload of the judicial system, the length and cost of the judicial process, and the lack of flexibility and confidentiality in resolving disputes leads to the inappropriateness of using this instrument for protecting the rights and freedoms of subjects. In this case, the parties are given the opportunity to use non-state forms of resolving legal conflicts, which are provided for by current legislation, in other words, alternative methods of resolving or resolving disputes. An analysis of practice shows that alternative dispute resolution in the Republic of Uzbekistan is only going through the initial stage of its development, especially negotiation and mediation methods of conflict resolution. It should be noted that the popularization of this phenomenon is facilitated by both the superior characteristics of alternative methods of resolving civil disputes compared to the judicial method of protecting violated rights, and the strengthening of the regulatory framework, for example, the adoption of the Law of the Republic of Uzbekistan of July 3, 2018 No.482 “On mediation”. The Government of the Republic of Uzbekistan, realizing that the system for protecting the rights and legitimate interests of individuals and legal entities requires improvement, also adopted Resolution of the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan of June 17, 2020 No. 4754 “On measures to further improve alternative dispute resolution mechanisms,” which specifies the need to create a unified system of pre-trial dispute resolution in government bodies, transform mediation, arbitration courts and international arbitrations into effective alternative dispute resolution institutions that are trustworthy for citizens and entrepreneurs. 126 Жамият ва инновациялар – Общество и инновации – Society and innovations Special Issue – 03 (2024) / ISSN 2181-1415 A number of legislative acts have provisions that promote the use of alternative dispute resolution methods in order to improve partnership relations. For example, if the plaintiff, before filing a statement of claim, did not comply with the claim procedure for resolving a dispute with the defendant, when this is provided for by law for this category of disputes or by agreement, then, in accordance with Article 107 of the Economic Procedural Code of the Republic of Uzbekistan, the court leaves the statement of claim without consideration. However, it should be emphasized that these norms are fragmentary and declarative in nature. In national legislation there is no such concept as “alternative methods of dispute resolution”; there is no exhaustive list of conciliation procedures, just as there is no indication of the methods that are permissible or recommended in a particular conflic