К содержанию
РецензированоRU2015

Этапы кодификации норм международного частного права

Nilufar RAKHMONKULOVA

Общество и инновации · 5 · 23-32 · 2015

Аннотация

Калит сўзлар: Ушбу мақолада халқаро хусусий ҳуқуқ нормаларини халқаро хусусий ҳуқуқ, тизимлаштириш босқичларининг ўзига хос жиҳатлари соҳалараро кодификация, ҳамда халқаро хусусий ҳуқуқни кодификациялаш турлари автоном кодификация, батафсил таҳлил қилинган. Таҳлил натижасида бугунги комплекс автоном кодификация. кунда дастлаб тарқоқ бўлган қисмларни қайта ишлаш ва бирлаштириш йўли билан комплекс автоном кодификация тури кенг қўлланилаётгани асосланган ҳолда, бу турдаги кодификациянинг афзаллиги исботланган. 1 DSc, Professor, Tashkent State University of Law. E-mail: nrakhmonkulova@inbox.ru Жамият ва инновациялар – Общество и инновации – Society and innovations Issue – 5 № 1 (2024) / ISSN 2181-1415 Этапы кодификации норм международного частного права АННОТАЦИЯ Ключевые слова: В статье подробно анализируются конкретные аспекты международное частное этапов систематизации норм международного частного право, права и виды кодификации международного частного межотраслевая права. В результате анализа выявлено, что на сегодняшний кодификация, автономная кодификация, день широко используется комплексная автономная комплексно автономная кодификация путем переработки и интеграции кодификация. разрозненных частей, а также обосновано преимущество этого вида кодификации. Before dividing the codification of private international law into types, it is considered appropriate to study the codification process in stages, and in the history of the process of national codifications of private international law four stages can be distinguished: 1. 90s of the 19th century – 60s of the 20th century. In the first stage: separate laws on private international law (Switzerland (1891), Japan (1898), Poland (1926)); special sections on conflict of laws included in civil codes or laws of codification of civil law (Germany (1896), Italy (1942), Egypt (1948)); scattered norms of private international law included in various special laws (one of the dominant trends) (Finland (1922)) were adopted. A private codification of judicial precedents was carried out by the American Law Institute in the United States in the form of the first “Collection of Conflict of Laws” (1934). In Iran in 1928 and Brazil in 1942, private international law and international civil procedure norms were combined for the first time in the process of codification (Iranian Rules of Accession to Civil Code of 1928–1936, Law of Accession to Civil Code of 1942). 2. Early 1960s – 1978s. The second stage was the adoption of the first special comprehensive law on private international law and international civil procedure in Czechoslovakia (1963) and the adoption of autonomous (Poland (1965), German Democratic Republic (1975)) and cross-sectoral (Polish Code of Civil Procedure (1964), Portugal (1966)) and sections of the Spanish Civil Code (1974)) characterized by the development of codifications. Some countries have adopted special laws on some aspects of the international civil process (Lebanon (1967)). The United States adopted the Uniform Commercial Code (1962) and the Second Conflict of Laws Act (1971). The USSR also joined the process of codification by introducing norms of private international law into the Fundamentals of Civil Law of the Union of the SSR and the Allied Republics (1961), the Fundamentals of Civil Procedure of the Union of the SSR and the Allied Republics (1961), the Fundamentals of the Law of the Union of the SSR and the Allied Republics on Marriage and Family (1968). The second phase culminates with the adoption of the Austrian Private International Law Act (1978), which established the principle of the most integral relationship as the main basis of private international law. 3. 1979–1998 years. In the third stage, the legislature was implemented in 8 countries (Hungary (1979), Yugoslavia (1982), Turkey (1982), Switzerland (1987), Romania (1992), Italy (1995), Venezuela (1998), and Georgia (1998) increased interest 24 Жамият ва инновациялар – Общество и инновации – Society and innovations Issue – 5 № 1 (2024) / ISSN 2181-1415 in complex autonomous codification. The Swiss Private International Law Act of 1987 is still the most detailed codification of private international law to date (201 articles). In the codes of a number of Islamic countries, separate sections regulating issues of private international law were adopted (UAE (1985), Burkina Faso (1989), Yemen (1992)). In 1986, significant changes were made to the German Civil Code. In 1992, a bill was developed in Australia to address the entire range of private international law issues. In the process of codification, Quebec and Louisiana (1991) adopted relevant sections in their civil codes, and the United Kingdom also participated, adopting the Private International Law (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act. In the early 1970s, in the 1980s, some documents on private international law were revised in the USSR, a section on conflict regulation was included in the foundations of the civil legislation of

Доказательный фрагмент

«Калит сўзлар: Ушбу мақолада халқаро хусусий ҳуқуқ нормаларини халқаро хусусий ҳуқуқ, тизимлаштириш босқичларининг ўзига хос жиҳатлари соҳалараро кодификация, ҳамда халқаро хусусий ҳуқуқни кодификациялаш турлари автоно…»

Образец извлечения

Демо-превью

Калит сўзлар: Ушбу мақолада халқаро хусусий ҳуқуқ нормаларини халқаро хусусий ҳуқуқ, тизимлаштириш босқичларининг ўзига хос жиҳатлари соҳалараро кодификация, ҳамда халқаро хусусий ҳуқуқни кодификациялаш турлари автоно… Полный текст публикации CiteX не хранит — доступ к первоисточнику открывается по DOI согласно лицензии издателя и выбранному плану.

Цитирований
0
Тип
Журнал
Страна
Узбекистан
Ключевые слова
private international law, intersectoral codification, межотраслевая кодификация, autonomous codification, комплексно автономная кодификация, международное частное право, complex autonomous codification, автоном кодификация, соҳалараро кодификация, автономная кодификация, халқаро хусусий ҳуқуқ, комплекс автоном кодификация
Открыть DOI
Спросить CiteX об этой работе

Смежные источники