Влияние реформ государственного управления на престиж Узбекистана на международной арене

Аннотация

Ключевые слова: В данной статье дается краткий обзор проведенных реформы реформ в системе государственного управления, государственного анализируется изменения в сфере управления, новые управления, подходы к регулированию, качество и объем оказанных государственная политика, государственных услуг, перспективы его развития в нашей цифровизация, стране. В ней также рассматриваются текущие планы оптимизация власти, развития системы государственного управления, Стратегия развития, проблемы и недостатки, которые на сегодняшний день все государственные услуги, еще существуют в данной сфере. Ссылаясь на концепция, децентрализация власти. международные источники, обсуждается место страны в наиболее важных рейтингах и индексах по данной сфере, а также предлагаются предложения по дальнейшему развитию системы государственного управления и повышению авторитета страны на международной арене. Over the past 6 years, the reform of the public administration system, revision of the legal framework of this system, the establishment of a new level of executive discipline, optimization of the system, radical change in the field of public services, as well as Systematic and targeted plans are being identified and implemented in the digitization of projects. In particular, work on new policies in the field of state development, i.e. development strategies focused on specific goals, clearly defining the relevant measures, concepts for reforming sectors based on the strategy, action plans and programs to ensure their effective implementation has begun. In total, more than 300 laws and more than 4,000 by-laws were adopted. They include the Development Strategy for 2017–2021, one of the main directions of which is the improvement of the system of state and public construction, according to which, over the past 4 years, the following has been achieved: The Concept of Administrative Reforms has been adopted in the Republic of Uzbekistan. In the period from 1991 to 2016, no documents were adopted in this regard. As a result: 110 inefficient interdepartmental collegial bodies were liquidated; 6 public functions were transferred to private sector entities; A system of corporate governance and financial audit has been introduced in 39 state-owned enterprises. As a result of the work carried out, a qualitatively new communication system with the people, and a positive and rapid solution to their problems has been created. A number of normative and legal documents have been adopted on the priorities of improving the system of state and society building, and the problems that have accumulated over the years have been resolved, and the sector has been fully regulated. 295 Жамият ва инновациялар – Общество и инновации – Society and innovations Special Issue – 05 (2022) / ISSN 2181-1415 In the system of Public Administration, it was achieved that the principle of checks and balances (scales) was practically reflected. The procedure for the approval of candidates for Deputy Prime Ministers, ministers and chairmen of state committees by the Legislative Chamber upon nomination by the Prime Minister, and approval by the President is established. Cooperation between the parliament and the executive power has been strengthened. For example, the post of Permanent Representative of the Cabinet of Ministers to the Oliy Majlis has been established. The system of hearing reports from local government leaders has been redesigned. The role of local Councils of People’s Deputies in solving urgent problems in the regions has been increased. In accordance with the policy of decentralization, the institutional system of the state apparatus was revised and significant reforms were carried out to streamline and increase its efficiency. 26 centralized functions have been transferred to territorial bodies and local self-government bodies. Including: – governors were given 6 important functions in the areas of budget, investment and construction; – 2 important functions in the field of taxation and investment were transferred to local councils; – 18 important functions in the field of tourism, education, housing, small industrial zones, veterinary medicine, ecology, drinking water, retail trade, public catering, medicines and real estate activities have been transferred to regional public administration bodies. The process of addressing socio-economic issues was overly centralized from 1991 to 2016. Only, in the judiciary, by 2022, based on the relevant decision, 2 agencies and their territorial structures were merged into the Ministry of Justice with the transfer of tasks, functions and powers. The number of management staff was reduced to 110 people. District (city) centres of legal services, public service centres, as well as civil registry offices were transferred to the structure and subordination of the district (city) departments of justice. In addition, recurring tasks and functions have been revised. Management structures were reduced from 666 to 222 (67%),