Обеспечение прав на интеллектуальную собственность (товарные знаки и географические указания) в рамках соглашение ТРИПС

Аннотация

Калит сўзлар: Мақолада ТРИПС шартномасининг интеллектуал мулк ТРИПС, ҳуқуқларини, хусусан, товар белгилари ва географик интеллектуал мулк, кўрсаткичларга бўлган ҳуқуқларни ҳимоя қилишга оид адолатли процедуралар, айрим моддаларининг қонуний шарҳлар бериш, шунингдек, даллилар, суд тақиқлари, Ўзбекистон Республикасининг амалдаги фуқаролик ва зарар. фуқаролик процессуал қонуничилиги билан қиёсий таҳлилқ қилинган. Обеспечение прав на интеллектуальную собственность (товарные знаки и географические указания) в рамках соглашение ТРИПС АННОТАЦИЯ Ключевые слова: В статье анализируются отдельные статьи соглашения ТРИПС, ТРИПС, касающиеся защиты прав интеллектуальной интеллектуальная собственности, в частности как права на товарные знаки и собственность, географические указания, путем предоставления справедливые и равноправные процедуры, юридических комментариев, а также сравнения с доказательства, действующим гражданским и гражданско-процессуальным судебные запреты, законодательством Узбекистана. ущерб. THE CONCEPT OF A FAIR AND EQUITABLE PROCESS. Article 42 of the Agreement obliges Member States to ensure the availability of appropriate civil judicial proceedings. Although this obligation is not too burdensome for states, countries with strong administrative law enforcement systems, such as China, may need to adapt their legislation to this norm [8, 7]. Literally interpreting the proposals of the article, it requires Member States to exclude all procedural actions not taken by the judiciary. However, the norm in the article does not apply to certain administrative and 533 Жамият ва инновациялар – Общество и инновации – Society and innovations Special Issue – 5 (2021) / ISSN 2181-1415 procedural actions (for example, provisional measures), if it is possible to appeal these actions to a higher authority. The term “right holder” used in this article refers to federations or associations such as copyright collecting societies that are recognized to have legal standing to file a joint action. In addition to the obligation to ensure an appropriate civil proceeding, Article 42 details a number of other procedural actions. The words used in the Article are general in nature and allow Member States to dispose a flexible approach to their application. These elements in the Article are intended to protect the interests of both sides of the process or one of them. A “fair and equitable process” includes: (a) Respondents have the right to receive a written notice detailing the grounds for a claim in a timely manner. This obligation means that the respondent should be allowed to present his defence. (b) An independent legal counsel acts as a representative on behalf of the parties. This is would be of facultative nature for the parties. An important aspect of this obligation is that if a legal entity in the country where the proceedings are being conducted does not have a domicile, it may, at its discretion, act through a legal representative. At the same time, this right does not exclude the requirement of mandatory participation in court, and it should not be overcomplicated for the parties. (c) All parties must have the right to substantiate their arguments and produce evidence relevant to the whole case. The right to justify arguments is important for a given due process [8,8]. National laws may provide that this right may also be granted to third parties involved in a case. (d) Article 42 provides for the disclosure and protection of confidential information during proceedings, provided that it does not conflict with existing constitutional requirements. The protection of such information is widely recognized in civil proceedings, but in some jurisdictions, it may be contrary to constitutional law and be prohibited. The fact that constitutional requirements are included in the Article means that the requirements depicted in Article 42 of the TRIPS Agreement should only be of “constitutional” character. The word "constitutional" in the Article can be interpreted in different ways. It may also mean principles in the constitutional framework of a state or a law governing these relations. The word "existing" in the context of this Article means a law that applies with regards to confidentiality. EVIDENCE. In case of violation of intellectual property rights, it is important to have evidence in order to substantiate the claim. Although this rule is mainly important for the plaintiff, Article 43[2, 339] of the Agreement applies equally to both parties. In some cases, the respondent needs to have evidence available to the plaintiff in order to defend himself and substantiate his arguments. The presentation of evidence during the process varies from State to State. In some cases, judicial requests for evidence can only be made if there is a risk of loss of the evidence which is in the control of the opposing party. In other cases, a request for evidence is made to determine if there has been an offense. Article 43 provides for the f