HUMAN RESOURCES POLICY – CONCEPTS AND ANALYSIS

Аннотация

This article deals with the specifics of military terminology (on the material of Uzbek and English languages). The relevance of the chosen topic is determined by a number of factors, including: the need for a deeper study of word- formation and structural features of military terminology; the importance of terminology research within the framework of comparative analysis, which allows us to consider terminology as an ordered system; as well as inadequate scientific elaboration of issues, etc. The purpose of the article is a comparative analysis of military terminology in English and Uzbek, which allows not only to compare Uzbek-speaking and English-speaking military terms, but also to highlight their specific features. Based on the analysis carried out by the author, it is noted that the main characteristic of military terms in English and Uzbek, among other terminological properties, is a special sphere of functioning, which is determined by a number of signs that allow one or another word or phrase to be classified as military terminology. Keywords: military terminology; comparative analysis; Uzbek-speaking and English-speaking military terms; ways of forming terms; lexical units; notions; warfare. Nowadays, issues related to the study of the specifics of military terminology in a comparative aspect (on the material of various languages) are becoming very actual. This is due to a number of factors: first, the need for a deeper study of word-building, semasiological, as well as structural features of military terminology; secondly, the importance of researching terminology in the framework of comparative analysis, which allows us to consider terminology as an ordered system that corresponds to the modern level of science development and meets modern research trends aimed at analyzing linguistic phenomena not in isolation but in close relation with many other areas of knowledge (military business, history, political science, etc.) [16, p.3-9]; and, thirdly, insufficient Available online: https://journals.eduindex.org/index.php/ejbss Pa ge | 27 European Journal of Business & ISSN: 2235-767X Volume 07 Issue 10 Social Sciences July 2019 Available at https://ejbss.org/ scientific development of issues and, accordingly, recognition of the need for a comprehensive analysis. Of particular interest in the study of military terminology is English, because it is the most important tool of expanding external relations of Russia and Western countries, updating international professional communication and intensive development of professional communication in English [8, p.1-3]. Moreover, the current paradigm shift of translational research (which is becoming more and more anthropocentric and, therefore, interdisciplinary in nature [18, pp.2-5]), is leading to a qualitative change in the translation of English military terminology. The translation becomes more meaningful and capacious; it begins to incorporate knowledge related not only to structural and word-formation features of terms but also to an extensive range of ideas about the ―human factor‖, about various spheres and problems, as well as about social, intercultural, political, historical and other phenomena that appear (one way or the other) in terminology [4, p.129-136]. And this phenomena, naturally, puts questions of the specifics of military terminology in a comparative aspect (based on the material of the Uzbek and English languages) from among the most relevant ones. Specifying the level of scientific development, it should be noted that these issues have been actively investigated by many domestic and foreign authors. In particular, the works of K.Ya.Averbukh [1], M.N. Volodina [3], S.V. Grinev- Grinevich [5], D.A. Kozhanov [10], A.V. Superanskaya [20], N.M. Shansky [21] and others. The specifics of the formation of English terminology are discussed in the works of S.N. Gorelikova [4], D.F. Kayumova, A.I. Shaidullina [8] and others. A comparative analysis of terminology (including military) in Uzbek and English is given in the works of M.A. Lazareva [11], Sh.Z. Dolimov [15], E.A. Ryabova [16], A.D. Samigullina [17] and others. However, from the point of view of complex analysis, the specifics of military terminology in a comparative aspect (on the material of Uzbek and English languages) are not fully investigated, which leads to a number of difficulties at the level of determining approaches and methods of studying these issues. Thus, the purpose of this article is a comparative analysis of military terminology in English and Uzbek languages, which (analysis) allows not only to compare Uzbek-language and English-language military terms, but also to highlight their main specific features. So, now there are many definitions of the word ―term‖. For example, according to O.S. Akhmanova, a term is a word or a word combination of a special (scientific, technical, etc.) language that is created (adopted, borrowed, etc.) in order to accurately express special