Цель и особенности методологии проведения допроса в уголовном судопроизводстве

Аннотация

Калит сўзлар: Ушбу мақолада Ўзбекистон қонунчилигига мувофиқ жиноий ишлар бўйича суд жиноий ишлар бўйича суд жараёнида иштирокчиларнинг жараёни судья томонидан сўроқ қилишнинг процессуал ва тактик жиноят процессуал кодекс асослари кўриб чиқилган. Ҳусусан, жиноий ишлар бўйича процесс иштирокчилари сўроқ суд жараёнига шахсни жалб қилиш мақсади ва асоси, сўроқ баённома вақти тактик усулларни қўллашнинг аҳамияти, судьянинг судланувчи саволларни шаклантиришда ва тартиб бўйича қўйишда жабрланувчи профессионал ва психологик фазилатлари таъсири, сўроқ эксперт 1 Doctor of law, professor Tashkent state university of law e-mail.: nematov_jasur@mail.ru Жамият ва инновациялар – Общество и инновации – Society and innovations Issue -1, №02 (2020) / ISSN 2181-1415 гувоҳ натижаларини расмийлаштириш талаблари белгиланган. далил Сўроқга тайёрланиш ва ўтказишда ҳамда аниқланадиган иш бўйича ҳақиқатни ҳолатларга тўғри ҳуқуқий баҳо беришни муаллиф аниқлаш услубиёти ёритилган.. Цель и особенности методологии проведения допроса в уголовном судопроизводстве АННОТАЦИЯ Ключевые слова: В настоящей статье рассматриваются процессуальные и уголовное тактические основы проведения допроса судьёй участников судопроизводство уголовного судопроизводства по законодательству уголовно-процессуальный Республики Узбекистан. В частности, определены цель и кодекс участники процесса основания привлечения лица к участию в уголовном допрос судопроизводстве, особенность применения тактических протокол приемов в ходе допроса, влияние профессиональных и подсудимый психологических качеств судьи на формулирование и потерпевший постановку вопросов, требования к оформлению эксперт свидетель результатов допроса. Раскрыта авторская методология доказательство подготовки и проведения допроса, а также правильная установление истины по правовая оценка устанавливаемых обстоятельств. делу. The Constitution of the Republic of Uzbekistan contains norms that form separate institutions of law regulating fundamental rights, freedoms and duties of a person and citizen [1]. In relation to legal status of individual in criminal court proceedings, all citizens, entering into criminal procedural relations, on the basis of constitutional status, have the same rights and freedoms and are equal before the law without distinction of gender, race, nationality, language, religion, social origin, beliefs, personal and social status [2]. The equality of citizens before the law and the court in administration of criminal justice is similarly reflected in Article 16 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Republic of Uzbekistan [3]. Therefore, the implementation of the requirements of the Constitution and the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Republic of Uzbekistan regarding the observance of human and civil rights and freedoms in criminal process is a guarantee of ensuring the rights and legitimate interests of the individual, which for some reason or other is involved in the sphere of criminal procedure relations. The specificity of criminal proceedings is in the fact that court activity established by law and brought into the form of legal relations, content of which is consideration and resolution of criminal cases. Accordingly, as it follows from procedural legislation, legal status of an individual in criminal court proceedings is characterized by the fact that it arises in view of obligation of prosecutor, investigator and inquiry officer, within its competence and gives the person one or other criminal procedural status, if they detect signs of crimes and need to take all measures prescribed by law to establish the events of crime, perpetrators of crime for their subsequent punishment [4]. This implies that the person is involved in criminal proceedings by gaining publicity at the stages of inquiry and preliminary investigation, therefore, determining the status of trial subject does not largely depend on court. Along 252 Жамият ва инновациялар – Общество и инновации – Society and innovations Issue -1, №02 (2020) / ISSN 2181-1415 with this, for each trial participant the procedure for attracting in criminal proceedings is determined by place and role, occurrence of event related to crime and occurrence of criminal offenses. Article 18 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Republic of Uzbekistan stipulates that all state bodies and officials who are responsible for criminal proceedings have to protect the rights and freedoms of citizens participating in criminal process. These include judges whose actions in the event of deviation from the requirements of procedural law, entail prosecution depending on nature and degree of public danger of committed act. Besides, damage caused to a person as a result of violation of his rights and freedoms in the proceedings is subject to compensation [5]. A citizen cannot enter into criminal procedural relations on his own initiative based on given provisions of legislation. Consequently, such initiative is given to officials who are respons