ФРАНЦУЗСКИЕ ФРАЗЕОЛОГИЗМЫ С ЗООНИМИЧЕСКИМ КОМПОНЕНТОМ

Аннотация

In this article, to identify and systematize lexical-semantic, linguoculturological and structural featuressystems of modern personal names in French. Competentuse of the anthroponym form, knowledge of a foreign language and knowledge foreign cultural models of personal names is one of the most important conditions the success of the process of intercultural communication. Many questions related to the functioning of personal names have been considered by various disciplines. Key words: zoonimy, onomastics, semantics, identification, linguoculturology. ФРАНЦУЗСКИЕ ФРАЗЕОЛОГИЗМЫ С ЗООНИМИЧЕСКИМ КОМПОНЕНТОМ. Аннотация. В данной статье необходимо выявить и систематизировать лексико- семантические, лингвокультурологические и структурные особенности системы современных личных имен во французском языке. Грамотное использование антропонимической формы, знание иностранного языка и знание инокультурных моделей личных имен является одним из важнейших условий успешности процесса межкультурной коммуникации. Многие вопросы, связанные с функционированием личных имен, рассматривались различными дисциплинами. Ключевые слова: зоонимия, ономастика, семантика, идентификация, лингвокультурология. Most phraseologists paid primary attention to the special status of phraseological units in the language, their specific categorical properties, and unmodeled syntactic structure. The internal contents of these units remained virtually out of sight. In addition, the task of identifying the special essence of phraseological meaning was solved mainly by comparing the meanings of phraseological units and words. The bulk of research by foreign linguists, in particular French, was carried out in a diachronic manner. Typical in this regard is the work of P. Guiraud, who is primarily interested in the etymology of the properties of phraseological units, and who sees the main reason for phraseologization in the presence of linguistic or extralinguistic (extralinguistic) archaism in the composition of the phrase. In this study, we did not abandon the attempt to find out the reasons and origins of the appearance of relevant features of phraseological units. But we tried to transfer the direction of analysis of these units to synchrony and, first of all, to their semantics, as the most significant, essential, emphasizing their national identity and determining their properties in the functional, communicative and connotative planes. Putting forward the concept of the specificity of the structure of the semantic content of phraseological units, we set ourselves the goal of studying the semantic space of the language, which is revealed by analyzing the semantics of phraseological units with a zoonym component in the French language. 6 24 International scientific journal ISSN: 2181-3906 «MODERN SCIENCE АND RESEARCH» 2024 VOLUME 3 / ISSUE 4 / UIF:8.2 / MODERNSCIENCE.UZ Having chosen French phraseological units containing a zoonym, we could not even foresee that a relatively limited set (only 1500 phraseological units) would appear as an exceptionally multifaceted phenomenon. We examined the object of study from different angles, and as a result, the study acquired the character of a multidimensional analysis of linguistic material. The work reflects various issues (some of them are debatable in modern science), such as: the formal grammatical organization of phraseological units, the specifics of the semantic structure, functional features, pragmatic meaning, significance in the processes of cognition and objectification of the world. During the study, we made a number of conclusions. Firstly, we classify phraseological units with a zoonym component as nominative units as a result of secondary indirect nomination due to the presence in their semantic structure of a subject-conceptual core, which helps to correlate these units with the realities of the surrounding reality. Secondly, in the structure of phraseological meaning, the dominant component is the connotative component, which explains the unlimited possibilities of phraseological units in the role of expressing emotional and evaluative meanings, relegating the nominative function to the