К содержанию
РецензированоUZ2020

terms of the creative Sciences Of Uzbekistan

Bakhadir Musametov

The American Journal of Social Science and Education Innovations · 05 · 2020

Аннотация

Islamic commentators of Aristotle’s Posterior Analytics, particularly Avicenna and Averroes point to unify the last sentence of I.6 and the first of I.7, and thereby shed a new light of Aristotle’s kind-crossing prohibition rule. Moreover, this paper will argue that despite Aristotle tried to strictly demarcate the boundaries of the sciences; in fact, he himself could not achieve it in the explanation of the healing of circular wounds. This case made Avicenna to widen the boundaries of the canons of demonstration. KEYWORDS Kind-crossing prohibition, per se attributes, middle term, demonstration transfer, scientific syllogism.

Доказательный фрагмент

«Islamic commentators of Aristotle’s Posterior Analytics, particularly Avicenna and Averroes point to unify the last sentence of I.6 and the first of I.7, and thereby shed a new light of Aristotle’s kind-crossing prohi…»

Образец извлечения

Демо-превью

Islamic commentators of Aristotle’s Posterior Analytics, particularly Avicenna and Averroes point to unify the last sentence of I.6 and the first of I.7, and thereby shed a new light of Aristotle’s kind-crossing prohi… Полный текст публикации CiteX не хранит — доступ к первоисточнику открывается по DOI согласно лицензии издателя и выбранному плану.

Цитирований
0
Тип
Журнал
Страна
Узбекистан
Ключевые слова
Kind-crossing prohibition, per se attributes, middle term, demonstration transfer, scientific syllogism
Открыть DOI
Спросить CiteX об этой работе

Смежные источники