К содержанию
РецензированоUZ2023

AVICENNA ON ILLICIT CROSSING THE BOUNDARIES BETWEEN THE SCIENCES

Bakhadir Musametov (Phd, Senior Research Fellow Department Of The Medieval Studies Institute Of History Of The Academy Of Sciences Of Uzbekistan)

The American Journal of Social Science and Education Innovations · 18-30 · 2023

Аннотация

Islamic commentators of Aristotle’s Posterior Analytics, particularly Avicenna and Averroes point to unify the last sentence of I.6 and the first of I.7, and thereby shed a new light of Aristotle’s kind-crossing prohibition rule. Moreover, this paper will argue that despite Aristotle tried to strictly demarcate the boundaries of the sciences; in fact, he himself could not achieve it in the explanation of the healing of circular wounds. This case made Avicenna to widen the boundaries of the canons of demonstration.

Доказательный фрагмент

«Islamic commentators of Aristotle’s Posterior Analytics, particularly Avicenna and Averroes point to unify the last sentence of I.6 and the first of I.7, and thereby shed a new light of Aristotle’s kind-crossing pr…»

Образец извлечения

Демо-превью

Islamic commentators of Aristotle’s Posterior Analytics, particularly Avicenna and Averroes point to unify the last sentence of I.6 and the first of I.7, and thereby shed a new light of Aristotle’s kind-crossing pr… Полный текст публикации CiteX не хранит — доступ к первоисточнику открывается по DOI согласно лицензии издателя и выбранному плану.

DOI не указан
Цитирований
0
Тип
Журнал
Страна
Узбекистан
Ключевые слова
Kind-crossing prohibition, per se attributes, middle term
Спросить CiteX об этой работе

Смежные источники