Functional Semantic Features Of Interrogative Sentences And Their Significance In The Text Abdullaeva Dilorom Akhmedovna

Аннотация

The article examines interrogative units and their functional-semantic aspects, the importance of interrogative units in the organization of the communicative field. The main function of interrogative units is to ask for content, which is revealed in examples. The article also scientifically analyzes the structure, semantics, and methodological use of interrogative sentences. Keywords: Interrogative sentence, interrogative category, functional-semantic field of interrogativeness, core and periphery of the field, typology of interrogative sentences. of the principle of the field, in the methods of analysis, Introduction: The study of interrogative sentences has in the approach to linguistic facts, we mean the been a significant topic in linguistics since historical important aspects of the field as a separate type of times. Interrogative sentences are characterized from system, grouping and interaction of linguistic elements. the perspective of their structure, semantics, stylistic Functional-semantic fields are language groups that use, role in communicative action, etc. Such versatility have the following properties: indicates their capacity, complexity and ambiguity. However, interrogative constructions do not exist in 1) the presence of common invariant semantic language, primarily in speech, by themselves, but functions in the linguistic means included in this group; rather in a certain textual continuity, speech, and 2) the mutual grammatical and lexical influence of not require understanding at a high categorical level. The only homogeneous, but also heterogeneous elements; first studies on the study of interrogative sentences in 3) a structure in which the following properties play a Russian linguistics were carried out in the scientific decisive role: a) the division "center (core) - periphery"; works of E.V. Gulyga and E.I. Shendels. [1, p. 97]. b) gradual transitions, partial intersections, "common Linguist A.V. Bondarko states that "a set of interacting segments" between the components of a given means constitutes a system - a grammatical-lexical grouping and different groups. The functional-semantic field. field has a two-sided character and has a content plane Interrogative sentences are multi functional and can be and a plane of expression. The plane of expression is used for different purposes depending on the type of known It encompasses the formal-structural aspect of discourse they refer to. Functions of questions in all the diverse linguistic means that are elements of a discourse are still a relevant problem for such areas as field. theoretical linguistics in general and pragmatics in A question is a statement intended to induce the particular. They are studied in relation to intonation listener to inform the speaker of something that and lexical or syntactic marking although many aspects requires clarification. Any question is based on some have not been researched yet especially those knowledge. By formulating a question, the questioner concerning categories of questions and speakers’ thereby wants to clarify this knowledge, to supplement intentions in the process of using interrogative and deepen it. A question is a form of thought that sentences (Hautli-Janisz et al., 2021). When we speak serves as a transitional link from incomplete American Journal Of Philological Sciences 127 https://theusajournals.com/index.php/ajps American Journal Of Philological Sciences (ISSN – 2771-2273) information (ignorance) to more complete information intent. The "why" question is addressed to the (new knowledge) based on the initial information disclosure of motivations that lie outside the language, (existing knowledge). The deep essence of the invariant but dictate to the speaker / writer the choice of the of the interrogative category is that, with all the corresponding linguistic materiality of the text. At the differences in speech situations where it is possible to same time, the linguistic forms from which the text is use an interrogative construction or a construction created are chosen by the producer not arbitrarily, but corresponding in meaning to an interrogative one, the in accordance with the extent to which their functional meaning of “request for information” remains potential corresponds to the target settings unchanged. This invariant is seen both in rhetorical implemented in a specific sphere of social and questions and in other types of transformed sentences. communicative practice. Correspondence/non- correspondence of linguistic means to the general goals The specific nature of the category of interrogativity of communication in a particular sphere can serve as and the field system of linguistic means and meanings the basis for their conditional division into two classes that forms it is expressed in numerous interactions with of unequal size: typical means, which have a high other systemic integrations (motivation, expression of frequency and form in their totality the “generally