Intertextuality as A Cognitive Category of The Text Makhmatkulova Yayra UzSWLU, Korean philology department, Lecturer, Korean language teacher, Uzbekistan

Аннотация

This article analyzes the importance, types, and applications of intertextuality in linguistics. Keywords: Cognitive linguistics, linguoculturology, intertextuality, stylistics, semiotics, etc. reading appears to be the process of text interaction. Introduction: Intertextuality is the generally accepted The writer encodes the message referring to both term denoting the interconnectedness and external and cultural sources which are inferred by the interrelatedness of texts. The term in 1966 was reader with the help of his literary and cultural introduced by Julia Kristeva in her work “Semiotics: A background. Consequently, while decoding the Critical Science and/or a Critique of Science” (Kristeva, author’s text the reader creates his own which is both 1968). According to J. Kristeva every text is an intertext a reflection of the author’s original text and his formed out of the previously constructed texts and personal background. which constitutes the basis of the next one, so the new text is thus viewed as part of the vast network of texts The divergence of opinions could be explained that the influencing one another. term of intertextuality is viewed in different ways. Some researchers refer intertextuality to a ‘technique The term itself has an intertextual meaning as it echoes of allusion’; others consider it to be a ‘part of the the concept of polyphony introduced by Mikhail network of evaluative devices found in literary Bakhtin (Bakhtin, Mikhail M. The Dialogic Imagination. discourse, which works in complex ways to deepen the Ed. M. Holquist, tr. C. Emerson & M. Holquist. Austin, meaning of the text’. All of them support the idea that Tex./London: University of Texas Press. 1981). Bakhtin a text does not exist in isolation, moreover it cannot be pointed out that polyphony reveals the existence of ‘a decoded in isolation from the vast network of texts plurality of independent and unmerged voices and from where, it takes its origins and which help to get a consciousnesses’. The Russian theorist dwelt upon the better understanding of a text. dialogical essence of speech which implies that speech is based on the interlocutors’ previous social, There are two approaches to the problem of communicative experiences that help both encode and intertextuality: broad and narrow. In a broad sense, decode the intended message of the interlocutors’ which is mostly accepted in the theory of literature, any utterances. Thus, the very speech by its nature is text is regarded as an intertext, which is defined as “a intertextual as it refers to the previously usages of universal text” that reflects the world culture and language, it is a multi-voiced set of experiences which history. As J. Kristeva claims «Any text is constructed of help create new texts. Bakhtin locates the logic of the a mosaic of quotations; any text is the absorption and literary word. transformation of another» (Kristeva, 1980). Another well-known theorist R. Barthes, developing Kristeva’s There is not one accepted mainstream definition of conception, asserts that “The text is a tissue of intertextuality. Intertextuality is referred to as a quotations drawn from the innumerable centres of unifying technique of text weaving by means of other culture…the writer can only imitate a gesture that is texts in literary discourse. It is an attempt to analyze the always anterior, never original” (Barthes, 1977). plurality of distinct voices in the narration which Accepting the assumption that neither text can be interact with the reader’s experience. The process of American Journal Of Philological Sciences 283 https://theusajournals.com/index.php/ajps American Journal Of Philological Sciences (ISSN – 2771-2273) regarded as original, he announced the “death of the teachers’ unions, community activist groups, and Author”. However, this approach, as the researchers reports from think tanks concerning a current note, allows to study only the ways of interactions of controversy over school funding, they portray an different texts, not the text itself (Чернявская, 2009). intertextual social drama. The newspaper report is shaping a story of opponents locked in political The narrow approach to the problem of intertextuality struggle. That struggle may in fact preexist the has been accepted in linguistics. Intertextuality in this newspaper story and the opponents may be using the view is understood as an explicit or implicit citing of newspapers to get their view across as part of that other texts (Arnold I.V., Fateeva N.A.), as a mechanism struggle; nonetheless, the newspaper brings the of co-presence of two or more texts within one text statements side by side in a direct confrontation. which has an explicit reference to the other. In other words, the fragments of the precedent text are 3. Text may also explicitly use other statements as introduced into the recipient one with the help of background, support, and contrast. Whenever a certain codes – intertextual mar