PAGE NO. 259-264

Аннотация

This article discusses the classification of Surkhandarya dialects from Uzbek folk dialects and their certain phonetic, lexical, morphological, word-formation, and syntactic differences. Information is also provided on the work of our linguists who have worked on the Surkhandarya Uzbek dialects. Keywords: Dialectology, qarluq-chigil, dialect, o‘guz, kipchak, literary language, national language, dialect, classification. Sheraliyev, and A. Shermatov have also made Introduction: Dialects can rightfully be called a rich significant contributions to the study of the lexical treasure that forms part of every nation's national features of Uzbek dialects. The study of Uzbek dialects language. Indeed, they may differ from the national has been divided into two main areas: literary language in several aspects-such as their phonetic, lexical, and grammatical features -but the 1. General classification of dialects (from a true values, rich heritage, and expressive nuances of a national or cross-country perspective); people’s language are preserved in their dialects, 2. Specific descriptions of dialects (within a passed down orally from generation to generation over particular oasis or region). the centuries. A dialect is considered a form of the Zarubin classified Uzbek dialects into four major national language, and the literary language develops groups: and becomes refined by drawing nourishment from these dialects. 1. Khiva, The Uzbek literary language is enriched by the dialects 2. Fergana, of the Uzbek people; however, they differ from one 3. Tashkent, another in certain phonetic, lexical, morphological, 4. Samarkand-Bukhara. word-formation, and syntactic aspects. In modern Yudakhin, while analyzing the relationships between Uzbek linguistics, the contributions of Russian various Uzbek dialects and the Tajik language, paid Turkologists such as I. I. Zarubin, special attention to the phenomenon of E. D. Polivanov, K. K. Yudakhin, B. B. Reshetov, and A. K. synharmonism. Building upon Zarubin’s classification, Borovkov, as well as prominent Uzbek dialectologists he added the Kipchak-influenced dialect group and the like Gʻozi Olim Yunusov, Sh. Sh. Shoabdurakhmonov, F. Northern Uzbek dialects. However, the Samarkand- Abdullayev, Kh. Doniyorov, B. Joʻrayev, A.S. Shermatov, Bukhara dialects were not examined in detail[2]. Later, A. Joʻrayev, and A. Toʻraqulov, have been invaluable in the classification of Uzbek dialects was expanded into solidifying this field of dialectology [1]. Along with these five groups: scholars, other linguists such as S. Rahimov, Q. 1. Tashkent, 2. Fergana, 3. Kipchak, 4. Khiva Muhammadjonov, Sh. Nosirov, T. Sodiqov, I. Rajabov, (including Oghuz features), V. Egamov, T. Gudratov, A. Aliyev, M. Mirzayev, E. American Journal Of Philological Sciences 259 https://theusajournals.com/index.php/ajps American Journal Of Philological Sciences (ISSN – 2771-2273) 5. Northern Uzbek dialects. j-pronouncing group) The Boysun dialect, for instance, was included in the 3. Southern Khorezm dialect Kipchak group[3]. 4. A Separate group of uzbek dialects [6]. Professor E. D. Polivanov conducted one of the most Literature review detailed analyses and classifications of Uzbek dialects. Although initial classifications of Surkhandarya uzbek In his classification, he described not only the dialectal dialects can be found in the works of scholars such as differences but also examined cases of mestizaje E. D. Polivanov and A. K. Borovkov, the first practical (intermingling of languages) and hybridization (cross- and systematic study of the region’s dialects was language influences). He distinguished between carried out by the linguist A. Mahmatqulov. He was the Iranianized dialects (such as those of Samarkand and first scholar to conduct scientific research specifically Bukhara) and non-Iranianized dialects (such as the on the “jo‘qchilar” dialect spoken in the Sherabad Kipchak dialects of the Fergana region). district. In 1960, he visited Sherabad to collect field Polivanov classified Iranian-influenced dialects into data and later defended a dissertation on this dialect. seven types: His research revealed specific features of the Sherabad Type 1: Samarkand–Bukhara dialects “j-pronouncing” (j-lovchi) dialects, including the Type 2: Tashkent dialects existence of a distinct demonstrative category and a well-developed plural formation system. His studies Type 3: Kokand–Margilan dialect were published in scientific outlets such as the Type 4: Andijan–Shakhrihan dialects “Masalalar” (Issues of Uzbek Linguistics) journal, Issue Type 5: Uyghur dialects (e.g., Namangan, Chartak) 4, (1960), where articles like “Verbal Forms in the Type 6: Northern Uzbek urban dialects Dialect of Sherabad's Jo‘qchilar” and “On the Consonant System in the Dialect of the Sherabad Type 7: Northern Uzbek rural dialects [4]. Jo‘qchilar” attracted considerable attention at the time Since 1936, building on Polivanov’s classification, and were regard