Bobir Normo‘minovich Mamarajabov

Аннотация

As a result of the colonial policy of the Russian Empire, the active migration of the peoples of Central Asia was observed, but this issue in the history of the peoples of the region has not yet been fully studied by local historians. Research conducted abroad on this topic cannot provide unbiased information for students due to different ideological views. In this article, a historiographical analysis of the study of the migration of Central Asian peoples by Western and local historians is carried out. Keywords: Ideological approach, national interests, cultural identity, national identity, integration, cultural alienation. complexities and consequences, have only recently Introduction: The first third of the 20th century was started to attract the attention of regional historians, one of the most tragic and transformative periods in these processes have long been the subject of the history of Central Asian peoples. It was a time extensive research in Western historiography. marked by immense human losses, mass migrations, Numerous comprehensive academic studies have fatalities, displacement, and forced departures from explored these migration phenomena in detail. their homelands. Sacred family ties were disrupted for many Uzbeks, Tajiks, Kyrgyz, Kazakhs, and Turkmens METHODS during this era. As a consequence of the 1917 This study employs a range of research methods, revolution and its aftermath, waves of migration gave including the analysis of scholarly and methodological rise to the emergence of Central Asian diasporas in literature, memoirs, and archival materials. The neighboring countries. research also draws on the examination and synthesis A diaspora refers to a community that originates from of advanced practical experiences. Analytical and a specific homeland but exists outside its territorial synthetic methods, induction and deduction, boundaries. Typically, a diaspora is considered a systematic-logical approaches, as well as historical and temporary and unstable formation. Over time, its statistical analysis methods, have been applied members either integrate into the host society or throughout the study. return to their homeland (reemigration). Integration is The State of Research on the Topic usually smoother when the host country’s One of the earliest researchers to study Central Asian geographical, cultural, and religious environment migrants was Owen Lattimore, who conducted closely resembles that of the country of origin. For this investigations in Xinjiang during the 1920s. He was reason, Tajiks and Turkic-speaking peoples were able to among the first to identify the unique character of integrate into Afghan and Turkish societies without Central Asia, shaped by the region’s extraordinary significant threats to their national and cultural diversity. Other notable works on Central Asian identities. migration include studies by Esserton, Bailey, Malleson, Although the new lives of Central Asian migrants Skrine, and Swedish diplomat and scholar Gunnar outside their historical cultural space, with all their American Journal Of Social Sciences And Humanity Research 355 https://theusajournals.com/index.php/ajsshr American Journal Of Social Sciences And Humanity Research (ISSN: 2771-2141) Jarring. Also noteworthy are the accounts of Georgy the Eastern Bukhara independence groups reflected Agabekov, a participant in Central Asian events of the the opposite: 60% were Uzbeks and 30% were Tajiks. 1920s; and the research of N. Shahrani and I. Nabi on Similarly, the majority of the migrants were also Afghan Kyrgyz and Uzbeks; as well as G. Lias’s works on Uzbeks. the Kazakhs. This discrepancy appears to have stemmed from In 1976, American ethnographer Audrey Shalinsky differences in the social and political status of the two began studying Afghan Uzbeks, stating that she turned groups. Uzbeks, possessing greater social status, had to Afghan ethnography to better understand her historically maintained political dominance over the “Sovietized” colleagues. Tajik majority, who were less militarized. Consequently, Tajiks were more likely to accept the Local scholars began investigating the history of new Soviet regime, which led to the collapse of the migrants in earnest only in the 1990s. The issue of existing Uzbek tribal-feudal power structure. Uzbeks emigrants who settled abroad has been addressed to and Turkmens, whose livelihoods were based on varying degrees in the works of Q. Radjabov, R. nomadic and semi-nomadic pastoralism, were more Shamsiddinov, R. Abdullaev, D. Ziyayeva, S. inclined to migrate, as they could easily relocate their Shadmanova, A. Mamajonov, A. Ermetov, and others. livestock. In contrast, Tajik peasants, who owned only RESULTS AND DISCUSSION the land they cultivated, were unable to take it with From the Russian Empire's conquest of Tashkent in them. 1865 until the Revolution of 1917, the peoples of Nonetheless, following the establishment of Soviet Central Asia experienced unpre