COMPARATIVE ANALYSES OF PREPOSITONS IN JAPANESE AND UZBEK LANGUAGES

Аннотация

In linguistics, the comparison of languages has always been in the center of attention. Although it is recognized by scholars that Japanese and Uzbek belong to the same language family, the Altaic language family, grammatical phenomena in both languages are not the same. While both languages have similarities, they also have differences. Comparing languages belonging to the same language family involves studying the phenomena that occur in that language. The category of agreement is widely observed in both languages, but there are some agreements between Japanese agreement agreements, which are given with one agreement in Uzbek, and the scope of application is narrow. The category of consonants is widely observed in both languages, but there are some consonants among the Japanese suffixes, which are given with one consonant in Uzbek, and the scope of application is also narrow. This article provides a comparative analysis of the Uzbek suffix of the accusative case and the differences between them KEYWORDS: - agreement; [ni] agreement suffix; [e] the suffix of agreement; morphological means; space. are called kakujoshi, meaning that they perform I NTRODUCTION the function of a suffix. In Japanese, there are は and がsuffixes, and in some cases no suffixes. In Due to the fact that the Japanese language the Uzbek language there is no suffix. which belongs to the family of Altaic languages, there encourages the analysis of different situations in are many similarities with the grammar of the both languages? Uzbek language. Although both languages belong to the same language hierarchy, Japanese is a ① は (although it is written as ha, it is separate group. Uzbek belongs to the group of pronounced as wa) In the comparative analysis Turkic languages. Although there are of the function of the suffix in the sentence with grammatically similarities in both languages, the Uzbek language the following can be given: there are also differences, as no two languages は (va) as an adjunct to the main clause, the main are identical in all respects. Differences in both part of the sentence serves to express the subject languages are also reflected in the agreements. of the sentence. The main consonant that T expresses the subject is what is known to the HE MAIN FINDINGS AND RESULTS speaker and the listener in the sentence, the In Japanese, conjunctions are called suffixes and information is the “subject”. For example, CURRENT RESEARCH JOURNAL OF PHILOLOGICAL 117 SCIENCES ISSN – 2767-3758 https://masterjournals.com/index.php/crjps CURRENT RESEARCH JOURNAL OF PHILOLOGICAL SCIENCES 2(5): 117- 121, May 2021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.37547/philological-crjps-02-05-25 ISSN 2767-3758 ©2021 Master Journals Accepted25th May, 2021 & Published 31th May, 2021 彼は有名な大学の学生です (1)。 There are more than はspecific features of the agreement, and a number of researchers are still Kareva yu:meina daigaku-no gakusei des. working on it. Since it is one of the Uø is a student at a famous institute. (Who is he?) はmultifunctional indicators, its only function as Although the Uzbek language does not have a an agreement indicator is to be able to perform suffix, it is functionally close to the Uzbek the function it has in a sentence and interact with language. Since the concept of topic is one of the the cut. Many linguists refer to it as both an most pressing issues, in some literatures it is auxiliary and a consonant, which cannot be given called xì zhùcí, not a suffix. Because it is said that in translation by a single morpheme, so it differs it has the ability to give meaning by completing from the main consonant in Uzbek in form, but is the verb. close in syntactic function. costs Another feature is that はreceipts can come in place of the In addition to the possessive part in は ““を(o)””, which is an agreement indicator (the sentences, it is used to express the topic you remaining agreements are presented in the want to emphasize, as well as to describe the old following paragraphs). The Uzbek language does information in the sentence. not have this phenomenon. There is no change in ここに桜の花がたくさんさきます。あの桜は咲 the meaning of the sentence. Compare: くと、一番うれしくなります。() Koko-ni この家は息子が建てた－この家を息子が建てた sakura-no hana-ga takusan sakimas. Ano sakura- va sakuto, ichiban ureshiku narimas. [Kono ie-va musuko-ga tateta – kono ie-o musuko-ga tateta] Sakura opens a lot here. I would be very happy if that sakura tree blossomed. O‘g‘lim bu uyni qurgan.- Bu uyni o‘g‘lim qurgan. - My son built this house. - This house was built by In the first part of the sentence he gives an my son. overview of the sakura, and in the second part of the sentence he mentions a sakura tree. He also Although 家は ie is replaced by 家をie-o in the says that the word is not new, because in the first sentence and は in the word, it has no effect on part of Gao there is a sakura tree. the meaning of the sentence, but the owner of the In Japanese, there are special consonantal sentence is 家in the first sentence,