EMOTIVENESS AS A REFLECTION OF EMOTIONALITY AT THE LINGUISTIC LEVEL

Аннотация

This article is devoted to the category of emotiveness which has been one of the most debatable problems in linguistics and the different views of some linguists about it. Considering the category of emotiveness as a linguistic aspect of emotionality, various linguists choose a different approach to the concept of emotiveness. Furthermore, the article represents the correlation of the category of emotionality with the categories of expressiveness, modality and evaluation. KEYWORDS: - Emotiveness, emotionality, expressiveness, modality, evaluation, pragmatics, linguistics, philologists. more than twenty years, many of its aspects are I NTRODUCTION still debatable. Over the past decades, the problem of M ETHODOLOGY emotiveness has been one of the most discussed in anthropocentric linguistics. As experts Considering the category of emotiveness as a characterize the current situation in the science linguistic aspect of emotionality, it should be of language, “linguistics, which has put the considered that, in the framework of this personality of a person at the center of his definition, various linguists choose a different scientific interests, uses the principle that approach to the concept of emotiveness. If for scientific objects as the main research principle such researchers as V.I. Shakhovsky, Sh. Bally, should be studied primarily by their role for the V.N. Telia, etc. emotiveness is primarily a person, by their purpose in his life, by their property of the semantics of individual language functions for the development of the human units, then for others (I.V. Arnold; T. Van Dyck; personality and its improvement ”(Kubryakova, K.A. Dolinin; I.I. Sandomirskaya) it is primarily a 1988). Emotions and various ways of expressing property of semantic associations of linguistic them from time immemorial have been one of units, that is, text. It is noteworthy, however, that the most intriguing questions that have ever most linguists unanimously recognize arisen in the process of human self-knowledge, functionality of the category of emotiveness, and therefore, increased interest in the verbal design the difference in concepts is determined, more of emotions does not cause surprise. However, likely, by the concentration of one or another despite the close attention that linguists have researcher on a particular function of this been devoting to the problem of emotiveness for category than by the negation of others. CURRENT RESEARCH JOURNAL OF PHILOLOGICAL 25 SCIENCES ISSN – 2767-3758 https://masterjournals.com/index.php/crjps CURRENT RESEARCH JOURNAL OF PHILOLOGICAL SCIENCES 2(7): 25-31, May 2021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.37547/philological-crjps-02-07-07 ISSN 2767-3758 ©2021 Master Journals Accepted24thJuly, 2021 & Published 29thJuly, 2021 So, some philologists focus not on the expressive, expressing his emotion, first of all expresses his but on the incentive aspect of emotiveness, i.e. attitude to the subject of speech, and does not at they are interested in emotiveness not just as a all seek to cause any emotion in the listener. The reflection of the sensory sphere of the primary function of emotive words is therefore information generator (for example, a writer or emotional self-expression. Whether it affects the speaker), but as a means of exciting certain listener or not is not always relevant for the feelings and emotions at the recipient of speaker, since pragmatics are not always information (for example, the reader or listener). included in his intention. But, of course, the In other words, they understand as a certain emotive words have a function of influence, it is experience of the subject, transformed by presupposed by their emotive meaning and is consciousness into linguistic symbols and realized when its purpose is present when causing an emotional reaction in the recipient expressing emotions ”(Shakhovsky, 1987, p. 52). (Bally 1961; Telia 1986) or as “a linguistic V.I. Shakhovsky also considers the designating or category that implies only those emotional naming aspect of emotiveness, saying that phenomena that are associated with the emotion is not only a form of reflection of reality expression of an emotionally-valued attitude, (namely, a reflection of attitude to the world), which are aimed at creating an emotional but itself is an object of reflection for the resonance in the listener ”(Sandomirskaya 1991, language and therefore is recorded in the p. 114). Linguists who consider emotion as a language: joy , disparagement, despondency, characteristic of the text tend to a similar fear, etc. (Shakhovsky 1987, p. 94). V. I. approach (T.A. Van Dyck 1972 (Dijk 1972) V.A. Shakhovsky, however, notes that the names of Kukharenko 1988; V.A. Maslova 1991; II emotions in the language are already meta- Sandomirskaya 1991; V.N. Telia 1991 (a); 1991 emotions, and not the emotions (6)). themselves: this is their conceptual designation. Other researchers primarily analyze the And if the word only means, call