THE ISSUE OF LANGUAGE FACTORS IN RECONSTRUCTION OF THE NATIONAL LANGUAGE OF THE WORLD

Аннотация

In world translation studies, scientific research aimed at getting acquainted with the culture, history, customs, traditions and national values of peoples on the basis of works of art, as well as the study of universal and differential situations in cultures is of great importance. In the last decade, the translation of works of art from Uzbek into French has been accompanied by the inadequate presentation of realities, phraseological units, paremies in the translated language, the omission of realities or their expression through Russian transliterations. Here, in the minds of any reader, Uzbek thinking, worldview and Uzbek mentality can lead to imperfect images. In order to solve these problems, research is being conducted on the current work, including training and conducting research to determine the quality. The need to discuss such critical issues on a comprehensive scientific basis determines the relevance of this research topic. KEYWORDS: - Adjectives “material,” “real”, “recreation, leisure”, “spectacle, playground, translation studies, Russian scholars, specific words. the adjectives “material,” “real,” and was later I NTRODUCTION interpreted as a term to refer to a nationally specific word. Although there is research on the role of the The lifestyles, worldviews, values, and peculiarities term reality in literary translation and its of the naming of things and objects of peoples differ differences from other terms, methods of from one another. Such peculiarities stem from translation into foreign languages and their their history, national values, customs and beliefs. classification, there is still debate among scholars in As a result, there are words that express different this area. Reality began to attract the attention of concepts that belong only to a particular people, Russian scholars for the first time as a word and such concepts are alien to other people. In expressing local, national color. In 1952, I. Kashkin, linguistics and translation studies, these are called in his article “False principle and unacceptable “realities” or “specific words.” In this study, results” expressed his views on foreign words and realities are considered as one of the most their translation into the language. According to the important elements of the national landscape of the scholar, “National specific words can be fully world. expressed in the language of translation only The word “realis” was originally derived from the through an in-depth study of the national spirit, Latin plural word “realia,” which originally meant characteristics of the original language, the CURRENT RESEARCH JOURNAL OF PHILOLOGICAL 64 SCIENCES ISSN – 2767-3758 https://masterjournals.com/index.php/crjps CURRENT RESEARCH JOURNAL OF PHILOLOGICAL SCIENCES 2(11): 64-71, November 2021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.37547/philological-crjps-02-11-16 ISSN 2767-3758 ©2021 Master Journals Accepted25thNovember, 2021 & Published 30thNovember, 2021 individual, psychological characteristics of certain magazine, blinds, provider, wardrobe, fiakr and nationalities the author’s style in the literary others have already lost their exotic level and text.”[1. 22–41] become assimilated words. In many cases we see that realities are interpreted as a component of This article by I. Kashkin started a debate among non-equivalent lexicon. the scholars of the field on how to define specific words, which words can be included in specific The difference between realities and non- words. According to AV Fedorov: “National color is equivalent terms of lexicon, exoticism, barbarism is reflected in the image and actions of the characters sufficiently substantiated in the research of associated with the social life of the nation.” [2. 76] Bulgarian scientists S. Vlakhov and S. Florin. L. Sobolev noted that “each character in the work According to scientists, realities must first be reflects his national image in his thoughts and distinguished from terms. Terms, unlike other actions,” and explained the word “national” with the lexical units, consist of unambiguous, synonymous, term "reality.” [3. 290] Vl.Rossels gave a broader often assimilated words, expressing the name of a interpretation of the term, that is, “Metaphors, particular concept, object and event. At the same similes, epithets, homonyms, idioms, tropes, time, such features are also present in realities. proverbs and sayings, all figurative expressions According to A.D. Schweitzer, there are realities that based on the laws of language appear in the can be called both reality and term, and even the national form. Their content reflects the character term “term - reality.” However, there are some and originality of the character of the work [4. 154- differences between them in a sense. For example, 162]. although reality is also a non-equivalent lexicon, it cannot be interpreted in any context in a translated T language like a term. For example, the terms HE MAIN FINDINGS AND RESULTS weekend, green-hall can be