THE HISTORY OF THE ANTHROPOLOGICAL ORIGIN OF THE UZBEK PEOPLE

Аннотация

This article discusses the ethnographic history of the Uzbek people. The same picture is observed in the composition of the Uyghur ethnic group. For example, not only modern Uyghurs, but also Uzbeks, Kazakhs, Kirghiz, etc. were formed from the Uyghur ethnic group. The same can be said about written records. Evaluation of the role of each of these disciplines as a source of ethnogenetic and ethno-historical information, the need for complexity, synthesis of developments in various sciences have been repeatedly discussed. KEYWORDS: - Ethnographic history, history of Uzbek people, composition of Uyghur, ethnic group, modern Uyghurs, Uzbeks, Kazakhs, Kirghiz, written records, a source of ethnogenetic, ethno-historical information. was inhabited by Scythians (according to Greek I NTRODUCTION sources), or Saki (according to Persian sources), Massagets and Sogdians, Khorezmians and other The largest nation in Central Asia, they are the ethnic groups. main and indigenous population of Uzbekistan, quite large groups of autochthonous Uzbeks live In general, the Turkic-Mongol tribes that roamed in northern Afghanistan, northwestern, northern, in the second half of the XIV century. in the western Tajikistan, southern Kazakhstan, eastern part of Dashti Kipchak, they were called southern Kyrgyzstan, northern and eastern Uzbeks, and their territory was the land of Turkmenistan. Ethnogenesis of Uzbeks Uzbeks. After their conquest in the first half of proceeded in Movaraunnahr and adjacent the 15th century. The local population of regions. The ancient peoples of Central Asia, Maverannahr also began to be called Uzbeks. It Sogdians, Bactrians, Khorezmians, Ferghans, should be noted that the ancient clans of Saks, Sako-Massaget tribes, eastern Iranians, and Massagets, Sogdians, Khorezmians and Turks, as Hephthalites, took part in the formation of the well as other ethnic groups that joined them a Uzbeks. In the VIII-II century BC. Central Asia little later, formed the basis for the formation of CURRENT RESEARCH JOURNAL OF HISTORY 15 ISSN – 2767-472X https://masterjournals.com/index.php/CRJH CURRENT RESEARCH JOURNAL OF HISTORY 2(7): 15-20, July 2021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.37547/history-crjh-02-07-04 ISSN 2767-472X ©2021 Master Journals Accepted 08th July, 2021 & Published 13thJuly, 2021 Uzbeks, Kazakhs, Kirghiz, Karakalpaks, Uighurs Movarounnahr) and Yagma (in the territories and other Turkic peoples, they also participated from the Ili River basin to Kashgar). The Yagma in the formation of the neighboring Tajik people. clan, before merging with the Karluks, was part It should be borne in mind that the same clans of the Tugiaguz (Tukkiz-Oghuz) ethnic group. and tribes could participate in the formation of The same picture is observed in the composition different Turkic peoples. For example, the Uzbek of the Uyghur ethnic group. For example, not and Kazakh peoples include the Kipchak, Jalair, only modern Uyghurs, but also Uzbeks, Kazakhs, Naiman, and Katagan clans. Kirghiz, etc. were formed from the Uyghur ethnic group. The same can be said about written T HE MAIN FINDINGS AND RESULTS records. Therefore, the fact of the presence in the Uzbek To date, extensive materials have been and Kazakh languages of common phenomena accumulated on the ethnogenesis and ethnic inherent in the languages of the aforementioned history of Uzbekistan, represented by data from genera should not be considered as a product of various sciences - history, archeology, the relationship between the Uzbek and Kazakh ethnography, anthropology, linguistics, folklore, languages of a later time. Therefore, the fact of onomastics, oriental studies, historical the presence in the Uzbek and Kazakh languages demography, geography, etc. Evaluation of the of common phenomena inherent in the role of each of these disciplines as a source of languages of the aforementioned genera should ethnogenetic and ethno-historical information, not be considered as a product of the the need for complexity, synthesis of relationship between the Uzbek and Kazakh developments in various sciences have been languages of a later time. Summarizing what has repeatedly discussed. However, in the history of been said, we can conclude that the domination the study of the ethnogenesis of the Uzbek of the ancient Turks in Central Asia covers the people, a mono-ethnic approach often prevailed, 5th-10th centuries, during this period, power is the data of related sciences were not sufficiently concentrated in the hands of the Tuku (V-VIII involved, the importance of certain disciplines century), Turks of Central Asia (552-745), the was absolutized, in particular, the substitution of Uyghur kaganate (740-840), the Uyghur state ethnogenesis by culture genesis and (up to the 10th century). glottogenesis, there was no correlation between the results of certain sciences among themselves Frequent changes in power did not lead to any and with political history. changes in the ethnic composition of the