К содержанию
CiteXCiteX — научный поиск с источниками
РецензированоEN2016

Peer Review Quality and Transparency of the Peer-Review Process in Open Access and Subscription Journals

Jelte M. Wicherts

Научные статьи · 2016

Аннотация

Recent controversies highlighting substandard peer review in Open Access (OA) and traditional (subscription) journals have increased the need for authors, funders, publishers, and institutions to assure quality of peer-review in academic journals. I propose that transparency of the peer-review process may be seen as an indicator of the quality of peer-review,and develop and validate a tool enabling different stakeholders to assess transparency of the peer-review process.

Доказательный фрагмент

«Recent controversies highlighting substandard peer review in Open Access (OA) and traditional (subscription) journals have increased the need for authors, funders, publishers, and institutions to assure quality of pee…»

Образец извлечения

Демо-превью

Recent controversies highlighting substandard peer review in Open Access (OA) and traditional (subscription) journals have increased the need for authors, funders, publishers, and institutions to assure quality of pee… Полный текст публикации CiteX не хранит — доступ к первоисточнику открывается по DOI согласно лицензии издателя и выбранному плану.

DOI не указан
Цитирований
0
Тип
Журнал
Страна
Узбекистан
Спросить CiteX об этой работе

Смежные источники