LEGAL ANALYSIS OF THE HARMONIZATION OF LEGAL EDUCATION AND MORAL EDUCATION IN NEW UZBEKISTAN

Аннотация

The article studies the theoretical aspects of the harmonization of legal education and moral education in New Uzbekistan, the socio-philosophical and legal analysis of the harmonization of legal education and moral education in New Uzbekistan, the socio-educational tasks and prospects of the harmonization of legal education and moral education in New Uzbekistan. The theoretical and methodological foundations of the harmonization of legal education and moral education in New Uzbekistan are also analyzed. Key words: education, moral education, dynamics, harmonization, social state, systemic-functional analysis, theoretical-methodological basis, development, legal education, social value, civil society. Introduction. Law and morality, while closely related, also differ from one another in certain essential features. These differences are as follows. Firstly, legal norms are adopted by the state with the active participation of community organizations and members of society. At the same time, the state has the authority to amend these legal norms, introduce additions to them, and, in some cases, even abolish them altogether. Therefore, in a certain sense, the state is the political foundation of law and its creator. At the same time, law is also a product of the state. Consequently, law does not merely reflect the will of the people but also embodies their will expressed through the supremacy of state interests. In this respect, law should be more accurately defined as a special state mechanism that regulates human behavior. Morality, however, is not created by the state but rather by society as a whole. Literature review and methods. The issues of harmonizing legal education with moral upbringing, the social aspects of modernizing moral and legal education, in particular, the organization of legal education within this process, the socio-legal status of moral upbringing, and the enhancement of the quality and effectiveness of legal education have been studied in the works of scholars such as A. Veil, D. Easton, J. Dennis, S. Palonsky, J. Piaget, J. Kevin, J. Torney-Purta, R. Bayniyazov, N. Voplenko, O. Demko, Yu. Dmitriev, N. Keyzerov, A. Malko, N. Matuzov, V. Salnikov, L. Matveev, E. Abzalov, N. Vakhobov, D. Dehqonova, Kh. Zakirov, Z. Islamov, I. Kudryavtsev, Z. Madalieva, Kh. Mamatov, O. Nasriddinova, Kh. Odilqoriev, Y. Sadikova, A. Saidov, U. Tojikhonov, N. 113 DEVELOPMENT OF PEDAGOGICAL TECHNOLOGIES IN MODERN SCIENCES International scientific-online conference Saydalikhodjaeva, R. Turdiboeva, A. Khamraev, Sh. Yakubov, B. Juraev, and S. Juraev. Results and discussion. The introduction of morality into social life does not require an official authorization or any legal document to legitimize it. What matters most is the approval and acceptance of moral norms by members of society, social groups, and the public at large. In the formation and development of moral norms, the state and other superstructural processes of society also play a significant role. Moreover, both law and morality are historical and cultural values, serving as key criteria that determine the progress of society. Law differs from other types of social norms, particularly morality, in that legal norms are adopted by the state in agreement with public organizations. While law and the state are inherently interconnected, morality, to a certain degree, maintains only a relative connection with the state. It should be noted that customs, traditions, and religious teachings also play a positive role in the formation and development of moral and legal norms. Thus, the relationship between law and morality acquires a distinctive dialectical character. Human behavior, regulated on the basis of legal norms, is simultaneously influenced by moral norms. However, unlike legal norms, moral norms do not necessarily require the participation of law in regulating human conduct. From this, it can be concluded that moral norms have a much longer history compared to legal norms. In other words, morality has existed since the very emergence of society, whereas law arose at a certain stage of the evolutionary development of society. According to the American legal scholar Lawrence Friedman, the concept of law is “as fleeting as a moment, as unstable as a bubble of water, as fragile as porcelain, and yet infinitely multifaceted.” For this reason, when addressing the relationship between law and morality and the place of law within the system of social norms, it becomes essential to gain a deeper understanding of the philosophical essence of law. The principle of justice is aimed at harmonizing the relations between participants in legal interactions, balancing the relations between the individual and society, and between the citizen and the state. Laws, in turn, reflect this balance on the basis of the principle of justice. B) The principle of democratization in the formation and implementation of legal norms. The distinctive feature of this principle is that