Badiiy asarlarda lokavtiv so’z yoki so’z birikmalarining qo’llanishi

Аннотация

В этой статье обсуждаются сравнительные различия между наречиями в английском и узбекском языках, роль наречий в английском и узбекском языках и их образование. Ключевые слова: Сложные предложения, наречия времени в английском языке, наречия времени в узбекском языке, союзы. Аннотация Ushbu maqolada ingliz va o‘zbek tillarida payt ergash gaplarning qiyosiy farqlari, ingliz va o‘zbek tillarida payt ergash gaplarningo‘rni hamda qanday hosil bo’lishi haqida so‘z boradi. Kalit so’zlar: Qo’shma gaplar, ingliz tilida payt ergash gaplar, o’zbek tilida payt ergash gaplar, bog’lovchilar. It is well known that in the following compound sentences, two or more simple sentences are connected by a mutual dominance-subordination relationship. The following sentence is subordinate to the main sentence and explains a part of the main sentence. The preposition and the adverb are grammatically and semantically connected, form a whole, and express a common idea. It is said that they enter into a relationship through the use of practical forms of the verb (adjective, adverb and conditional verb combined with various grammatical means), auxiliary words 9(Abdurahmanov G., 1996, 185). The grouping of the following conjunctions is determined by which part of the preposition follows. It should be noted that there is a commonality among linguists in the classification of adverbs. In Uzbek linguistics, adverbs are subdivided into 14 types: 1) possessive, 2) participle, 3) complementary, 4) determiner, 5) form, 6) measure- degree, 7) comparative. analogy, 8) cause, 9) purpose, 10) time, 11) place, 12) condition, 13) unimpeded, 14) result-following statements (Gulomov A., Askarova M., 1987, 187). N.Mahmudov also analyzes the semantics of the following compound sentences on the basis of the same classification (Nurmonov A., Mahmudov N., Ahmedov A., Solikhojaeva S., 1992, 243). G.Abdurahmanov divides them into the following types: 1) determinant, 2) complementary, 3) possessive, 4) cut, 5) time, 6) cause, 7) condition, 8) purpose, 9) unobstructed, 10) result, 11) form, 12) comparison, 13) generalizing-explanatory sentences (Abdurahmanov G., 1996, 191-216). Although all of the above conjunctions are reflected in his classification, the comparative and generalizing follow-up sentences are unreasonably fragmented. For example, while commenting on the nature of conjunctions with generalizations, he writes: “There are types of adverbs that are connected to the preposition in an analytical-synthetic way. In this case, the preposition and the adverb 100