LINGUISTIC INTERPRETATION AND STRUCTURE OF THE CONCEPT

Аннотация

ed from themeanings oftheir specific linguistic realizations, and theirsemantics contains both “subjective” and ethnocultural semes. "Universal concepts" (e.g., "norms") provide the standard needed for abstraction from an unknown number of linguistic applications, as well as for cross-linguistic comparison and translation. Examples include scientific consciousness, moral terms, and logical operators ("good-bad," "good-bad-indifferent," etc.). In turn, autochthonous (from the Greek "autochthon" - local, characteristic of a given area) concepts may not only be intralingual, monoglossy, that is, abstracted from lexical units of two or more languages. For example, they may be polyglossy, like the "limit concepts" of Western and Eastern language cultures. The main means of activating a concept in the communication process are linguistic signs. Linguistic units, i.e. elements of language, play an important role in the full and comprehensive expression of a concept. For example, words, expressions, phraseological units, sentences of a wide range of application are the means that form the conceptual basis. However, the name of the concept is not the only sign that activates it in the human consciousness. Any component can be realized in the form of another sign. For example, to activate the concept of "nature" in the consciousness ofa native speaker of theUzbek language, not onlythe lexeme"bino" can beused, but also "oila", "sulola", etc. This concept can also be expressed by paralinguistic means, for example, by rubbing the index and middle fingers with the thumb. The more diverse the https://ijmri.de/index.php/jmsi volume 4,issue6,2025 121 possibilities of symbolizing a concept, the more ancient it is and the higher its value from the pointofview ofa specificlanguage community. [5: 35] Conclusion. In the linguistic sense, a concept is a unit of collective consciousness that has a linguistic expression and a certain ethnocultural identity. Concepts include attached lexemes, the meanings of each of which are carriers of separate content that form the content of national linguisticconsciousness. Secondly, in a narrow sense, the concept is defined by linguacultural identity and includes semantic formations that characterize the bearers of a particular ethnoculture. The range of concepts studied by researchers is constantly expanding, which indicates the dynamic development of linguacultural studies. The article scientifically analyzes the difference between conceptual and semantic features, the linguistic and intercultural specificity of universal and autochthonous concepts, as well as the interaction of linguistic and cultural factors. National and universal values, the place of concepts in the lexical-semantic paradigm, their cultural and moral content are reflected. Listof references: 1. Telia V.N. The human factor in language: Language mechanisms of expressiveness. Moscow: Nauka, 1991.–p.214; 2. Yakovleva A.S. The category of evaluation in public speeches of P.A. Stolypin and Otto von Bismarck: based on the Russian and German languages: diss. ... candidate of philological sciences: -Tyumen, 2006.–P.309.; 3.SterninI. A.Methodology for studying thestructure ofa concept// Methodologicalproblems of cognitive linguistics: scientific publication / edited by I. A. Sternin. Voronezh: Publishing house ofVoronezh StateUniversity, 2001.- P.58. 4. Stepanov Yu.S. Constants: Dictionary of Russian Culture. Moscow: School "Languages ​ ​ ofRussian Culture", 1997.-P.45. 5. Megentesov S. The linguocultural concept of “language” and approaches to its study. – M., 1993.–P.35 6.PopovaZ.D., Sternin I.A. Cognitive linguistics. –M.:AST: East –West, 2010..–P.314. https://ijmri.de/index.php/jmsi volume 4,issue6,2025 122