К содержанию
РецензированоEN2025

EXPRESSION OF LEXICAL ECONOMY IN ENGLISH AND UZBEK THROUGH STYLISTIC MEANS

THROUGH STYLISTIC MEANS · Author: Omonov Baxtiyor · Co-author: Saidov Xayrullo

Образование наука и инновационные идеи в мире · 2025

Аннотация

Lexical economy refers to the tendency of languages to convey more meaning using fewer words. This article explores how lexical economy is expressed through stylistic means in both English and Uzbek. It analyzes ellipsis, abbreviation, compounding, nominalization, and agglutination, offering examples and comparisons. These features are examined in terms of their stylistic function in both literary and colloquial contexts. The paper aims to contribute to cross-linguistic stylistic studies and enhance understanding of linguistic minimalism as a creative and communicative tool. Annotation This article investigates the phenomenon of lexical economy and its stylistic manifestations in English and Uzbek. The study aims to identify how both languages employ various linguistic tools—such as ellipsis, abbreviation, compounding, nominalization, and agglutination—to convey more meaning using fewer words. The analysis is based on descriptive and comparative methods, focusing on examples from literary, colloquial, and digital contexts. The findings demonstrate that while English relies heavily on analytic strategies such as abbreviation and ellipsis, Uzbek achieves economy through agglutination, contextual omission, and informal borrowing. The study highlights the functional and stylistic significance of lexical economy in modern communication. This cross-linguistic perspective provides insights into the creative and efficient use of language structures in two typologically distinct systems. https://scientific-jl.org/obr Выпуск журнала №-73 279 Часть–1_ июл–2025 ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ НАУКА И ИННОВАЦИОННЫЕ ИДЕИ В МИРЕ 2181- 3187 Keywords: lexical economy, ellipsis, agglutination, abbreviation, stylistics, Uzbek language, English language 1. Introduction Language naturally evolves towards efficiency. Lexical economy, or the principle of saying more precisionh fewer words, is found in all languages and serves various stylistic purposes: clarity, precision, brevity, and aesthetics. English, being an analytic language, and Uzbek, an agglutinative one, approach lexical economy differently but precisionh comparable goals. Understanding how each language achieves this helps us better grasp how meaning is compactly and creatively conveyed. 2. Lexical Economy in English English achieves lexical economy through various stylistic strategies: 2.1 Ellipsis: The deliberate omission of words understood from the context. Examples: - "You going to the party?" (instead of "Are you going to the party?") - "John can play the guitar; Mary, the piano." 2.2 Abbreviations and Acronyms: Examples: - UN (United Nations), AI (Artificial Intelligence), DIY (do-it-yourself) - In informal texts: "u" (you), "r" (are), "idk" (I don't know) 2.3 Compounding and Blending: Examples: - "Webinar" (web + seminar), "Infomercial" (information + commercial) Stylistic use in branding: "Netflix" (internet + flicks) https://scientific-jl.org/obr Выпуск журнала №-73 280 Часть–1_ июл–2025 ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ НАУКА И ИННОВАЦИОННЫЕ ИДЕИ В МИРЕ 2181- 3187 2.4 Nominalization: Transforming verbs into nouns allows more formal, compact expression. Examples: - "The committee decided" → "The decision of the committee" - "He failed to respond" → "His failure to respond" (Note: Netflix is a blend, not a traditional compound) 3. Lexical Economy in Uzbek Uzbek exhibits economy primarily through agglutination and ellipsis. 3.1 Contextual Ellipsis: Omission of verbs or nouns that are clear from context. Example: - "Men boraman, u — yo‘q." (I will go, he — not.) - "Sen maktabga, men — bozorga." 3.2 Affixation and Agglutination: Uzbek combines root words with suffixes for tense, person, negation. Example: - "Ko‘rmayapman" (I am not seeing) = root + negation + progressive + person 3.3 Reduplication and Shortening: Informal forms like: - "Televizor" → "televik" - "Institut" → "instik" Common in youth slang and colloquial speech. 3.4 Borrowings: Russian and English borrowed terms often shortened: https://scientific-jl.org/obr Выпуск журнала №-73 281 Часть–1_ июл–2025 ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ НАУКА И ИННОВАЦИОННЫЕ ИДЕИ В МИРЕ 2181- 3187 - "Univer" (university), "komp" (computer) Also used creatively in media: "siyosatshunos" (political scientist) 4. Comparative Examples English: "I'll go, and she'll go too." → "I'll go, she too." Uzbek: "Men boraman, u ham boradi." → "Men boraman, u ham." English: "Information Technology" → IT Uzbek: "Axborot texnologiyalari" → AT English compound: "toothbrush" Uzbek: "tish cho'tkasi" (literally: tooth brush — a phrase, not a compound) (Note: 'AT' is less commonly used in Uzbek than 'IT' in English) 5. Functional and Stylistic Roles Lexical economy isn't just about saving space. It reflects tone, style, and register: - In poetry: it creates rhythm and emphasis. - In journalism: it enhances clarity and impact. - In casual speech: it reflects intimacy and spontaneity. - In digital communication: it enables speed and brevity. Example from poetry: - English: "Veni, vidi, vici" (I came, I s

Доказательный фрагмент

«Lexical economy refers to the tendency of languages to convey more meaning using fewer words.»

Образец извлечения

Демо-превью

Lexical economy refers to the tendency of languages to convey more meaning using fewer words. Полный текст публикации CiteX не хранит — доступ к первоисточнику открывается по DOI согласно лицензии издателя и выбранному плану.

DOI не указан
Цитирований
0
Тип
Журнал
Страна
Узбекистан
Ключевые слова
lexical economy, ellipsis, agglutination, abbreviation, stylistics, English achieves lexical economy through various stylistic strategies: 2.1 The Ellipsis: deliberate
Спросить CiteX об этой работе

Смежные источники