К содержанию
РецензированоRU2025

THE CONTEXTUAL INTERPRETATION OF IRONY IN ENGLISH AND UZBEK LANGUAGES

AND UZBEK LANGUAGES · TILLARI MISOLIDA · Key words: Irony (Student of Tashkent state transport university) · Contextual interpretation (Student of Tashkent state transport university) · English language (Student of Tashkent state transport university)

Современное образование и развитие · 45 · 823–839 · 2025

Аннотация

речи, подчеркивая сходства и различия в их синтаксических структурах, лексическом выборе и культурных отсылках. В то время как английский язык склонен полагаться на прямые, часто индивидуалистичные выражения иронии, такие как сарказм, узбекская ирония более косвенная, отражая коллективистские культурные ценности и акцент на вежливости и социальном согласии. В статье также рассматривается роль контекста в определении, воспринимается ли выражение как ироничное, при этом оба языка Выпуск журнала №-26 Часть–1_ Май –2025 13 MODERN EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT сильно зависят от контекстуальных подсказок для передачи предполагаемого значения. Ключевые слова: Ирония, Контекстуальная интерпретация, Английский язык, Узбекский язык, Культурные различия, Кросс-лингвистическая прагматика, Теория вежливости, Косвенная коммуникация, Синтаксическая структура, Лексическое контрастирование. Annotatsiya: Tadqiqot ingliz va o‘zbek nutqidagi ironiyaning qanday amalga oshirilishini taqqoslaydi va qarama-qarshi qo‘yadi, ularning sintaktik tuzilmalari, leksik tanlovlari va madaniy ishoralari orasidagi o‘xshashliklar va farqlarni ta'kidlaydi. Ingliz tilida odatda ijtimoiy aloqaning to‘g‘ridan-to‘g‘ri, ko‘pincha individualistik ifodalari, masalan, sarqazmga tayaniladi, o‘zbek ironiyasi esa ko‘proq bilvosita bo‘lib, kollektivistik madaniy qadriyatlarni va muloyimlik hamda ijtimoiy uyg‘unlikka e'tibor qaratadi. Maqolada shuningdek, ifodaning ironik deb qabul qilinishini aniqlashda kontekstning roli ko‘rib chiqiladi, ikkala til ham maqsadli ma'no komunikatsiya qilishda kontekstual ko‘rsatkichlarga katta tayanadi. Kalit so’zlar: Ironiya, Kontekstual talqin, Ingliz tili, O‘zbek tili, Madaniy farqlar, Kross-lingvistik pragmatika, Muloyimlik nazariyasi, Bilvosita kommunikatsiya, Sintaktik tuzilma, Leksik kontrast. Inrtoduction. Irony is a sophisticated and multifaceted phenomenon in language, one that is used to convey meanings that are often opposite or contradictory to the literal interpretation of a statement. It plays an essential role in both verbal and written communication across cultures, serving as a tool for humor, criticism, sarcasm, and social commentary. Though irony is recognized as a universal linguistic feature, its realization and interpretation are heavily influenced by cultural norms, communicative practices, and the structural characteristics of individual languages. As such, understanding the nuanced use of irony in different languages is crucial for the study of pragmatics and intercultural communication.The study of irony in English has a long and established tradition, with scholars such as Wayne C. Booth and Linda Hutcheon offering frameworks to understand how irony functions in literature and everyday discourse. English irony is typically direct and explicit, with speakers often Выпуск журнала №-26 Часть–1_ Май –2025 14 MODERN EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT relying on tone, context, and lexical choices to signal their intended meaning. Irony in English is particularly prevalent in casual conversation, where speakers might employ sarcastic remarks, hyperbole, or exaggerations to express their discontent or to critique social norms. For example, saying “Oh, great!” in response to a frustrating situation can be understood as an ironic expression of dissatisfaction. The irony here is understood through both the context and the speaker’s tone, which contradicts the positive surface-level meaning of the words. This reliance on direct contrast between the literal and the intended meaning makes English irony highly recognizable, but also context-dependent.In contrast, irony in Uzbek, while sharing certain functional similarities with English, is shaped by different cultural and linguistic norms. Uzbek is a language that has strong ties to collectivist values, and as a result, irony in Uzbek often manifests in indirect, polite expressions that are meant to preserve social harmony. Unlike English, which tends to favor individualistic expressions of irony that openly critique or mock, Uzbek irony is frequently embedded within culturally rich idioms, proverbs, and traditional expressions. These forms of irony are often used to convey criticism, sarcasm, or humor in a way that does not threaten social cohesion. For example, a speaker may say “Zo‘r qilipsiz!” (“You’ve done an amazing job!”) in response to a poorly executed task. The literal meaning appears positive, but the irony arises from the discrepancy between the words and the actual outcome, which is understood by the listener within the cultural context. In Uzbek, this indirect approach allows the speaker to express their dissatisfaction without confrontation, maintaining the delicate balance of social relationships.The study of irony across languages— especially between languages with distinct cultural values and communicative practices, such as English and Uzbek—provides a valuable opportunity to examine both the universal and culturally specific elements of irony. While iron

Доказательный фрагмент

«речи, подчеркивая сходства и различия в их синтаксических структурах, лексическом выборе и культурных отсылках.»

Образец извлечения

Демо-превью

речи, подчеркивая сходства и различия в их синтаксических структурах, лексическом выборе и культурных отсылках. Полный текст публикации CiteX не хранит — доступ к первоисточнику открывается по DOI согласно лицензии издателя и выбранному плану.

DOI не указан
Цитирований
0
Тип
Журнал
Страна
Узбекистан
Ключевые слова
Irony, Contextual interpretation, English language, Uzbek, Uzbek language, Indirect communication, Lexical contrast., Politeness theory, Cross-linguistic pragmatics, Syntactic structure, Cultural differences
Спросить CiteX об этой работе

Смежные источники