CULTURAL LINGUISTIC STUDIES OF THE CONCEPTS: FRAME ANALYSIS

Аннотация

В данной статье раскрывается, что культурно-лингвистические особенности выражаются на основе концепции, особенно в области переводоведения. Основным методом анализа переведенного на каракалпакский язык стихотворения Байрона является выявление основных лексических фреймов, которые могут помочь нам универсально концептуализировать человеческую душу. Проводя фреймовый (фрейминг) анализ, который Эрвин Гоффман начал использовать в своей книге, мы определили, что «душа» является основной концепцией, связывающей людей с любовью, печалью, родиной, тоской и отчаянием. В переводах стихотворения Байрона «Строки, написанные в альбоме» «душа» была показана аналогично как по смыслу, так и по переводу. В заключение, важные фреймы, такие как путешественник, мертвец, могила, лекарство, мост, тьма, помогают воплотить душу автора и были классифицированы в подгруппы фреймирования, такие как лингвистический фрейм, эмоциональный и духовный фрейм, метафорический фрейм, философский фрейм, структурный фрейм, контекстуальные фреймы. Ключевые слова. фреймовый (фрейминг) анализ, аналитический метод, структурные элементы, концепция, контекстуальный фрейм дух/рух, универсальный. We strive to deepen our understanding of universal concepts of humanity through the physical objects, phenomena, events, and changes in our physical world. These elements generate 87 concepts within a specific human conceptual system, that is, they create clear frames in the mind, which help to solidify the nature of these concepts. Therefore, framing or categorizing concepts enhances the speed and clarity with which the brain visualizes information or events, facilitating their organization into images. The initial definitions were provided by scholar Irving Goffman, who discusses framing or frame analysis in his book, emphasizing personal experiences and social structures. He differentiates individual experiences from the broader societal structure and illustrates how individuals strive to learn from their life experiences, as well as addressing issues related to the framing of social life and social structure [3]. Frame analysis can be observed as having initially emerged in the field of sociology. However, this analytical method is also widely applied in psychology, discourse studies, philosophy, and linguistics. Lawrence W. Barsalou has explored three distinct components of frames: attribute-value sets, structural invariants, and constraints. He elucidates that frames are structured entities characterized by dynamic relationships among these forms, emphasizing that the rigid configuration of attributes can lead to specific outcomes. Furthermore, in both artificial and human intelligence domains, frames support a range of conceptual tasks. They not only represent significant events, norms, and plans but also play a crucial role in defining the conceptual landscape and integrating various concepts within that domain. This highlights the importance of frames in understanding the complexities of conceptualization and interaction within social contexts [1, 21 p.]. Undoubtedly, the frame structures in the mind are closely related to a person’s life experiences and background. George Lakoff and Mark Johnson connect this to the ‘gestalts’ in human experience, stating that ‘there is a degree of conceptual salience that fully realizes our ability to generate images and gestalt perception from our concepts and motor schemes [4, 77 p.]. In some sources, frames are understood as cognitive structures that represent stereotypical events. In this case, frames are defined in a specific context and are encoded in the brain through relational, role-action, and other specialized dimensions, or they are mental frames. For example, the word ‘meal’ can evoke ‘waiter,’ ‘customer,’ ‘food,’ and ‘ordering a meal [2, 222-254 p.]. One of the pioneers in introducing ‘Frame Semantics,’ Charles Fillmore’s ideas [2, 222-254 p.]. on semantic and conceptual frames are invaluable in cognitive linguistics, as they examine the relationships between language and thought. He believes that language is based on our experiences and social interactions. Alexander Zeim almost supports this idea: Frames are a conceptual unit of knowledge that linguistic explanations evoke. Additionally, language users recall these frames to understand linguistic meaning. Therefore, knowing what a particular explanation means and how it is used implies the introduction of a specific cognitive structure, which is related to the previous explanation [5, 2 p.]. Now Let’s look at the translated version of Byron’s poem in the Karakalpak language. Lines written in an album As o‘er the cold sepulchral stone Some name arrests the passer-by; Thus, when thou view’st this page alone, May mine attract thy pensive eye! And when by thee that name is read, Perchance in some succeeding year, Reflect on me as on the dead, And think my heart is buried here. In the Karakalpak translation: Альбомға Жалғыз мазар турған қула далада Тербемей